Problem with Feynman's iε prescription

  • Thread starter Thread starter alfredoalfred
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of applying Feynman's iε prescription to resolve singularities in integrals related to particle energy. The integral in question becomes non-convergent due to a singularity dependent on the energy E. By shifting E to E - iε, the singularity is effectively removed, allowing for proper integration. The user seeks clarification on the necessity of the iε term, particularly its role in ensuring causality by determining the direction of particle propagation. Understanding this concept is crucial for grasping the implications of the iε prescription in quantum field theory.
alfredoalfred
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



My Problem is with Feynman's iε prescription. Trying to solve an Integral, it happens that there is a singularity s on the way. s depends on the Energy E of a particle. This integral is not convergent and doenst make any sense. To solve this Problem, one displaces the Energie from E to E - iε, with ε being very small. ( In Case of an anti particle it is E + iε).

Homework Equations



So the denominator of the dr integral looks like this: [ sqrt(r) - sqrt(2*(M-E' ) ] . now r gets integrated in such a way, that it always would hit the singularity s=sqrt(2*(M-E')). Changing E to E-iε however gets rid of the singularity. My problem is now not how to solve the Integral with the iε (which I am glad i found out already by myself), but to argue why we need such an iε in there in the first place.

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to look up several books in Quantum field theory , but as i haven't taken such a course yet i don't understand them very well. There is so much stuff in there that I am not really sure I am missed an explanation. I am very confused :( .

Can you help to help me and give me a tip where i can find anything that explains it in maybe not a rigourous way? Trying to google feynman iε prescription has not really helped me :(

thank you very much for reading and maybe answering :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The short answer is that the choice of the sign of i*epsilon determines whether you have chosen a propagator that propagates into the past or propagates into the future. For causalities sake you want the latter.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K