Problem with natural units in Cosmology

[Magister]

Homework Statement

Reading about the raditation dominated era I saw that the radiation energy density today was given by:

<br /> \rho_r = \frac{\pi^2}{30} g_* T^4 = 8.09 * 10^{-34} g/cm^3<br />

where g_*=3.36 is the degree of freedom of the radiation (equivalent) and T=2.75 K is the CBR temperature today.

The problem is that they don't give me the exact expression and so this relation seems to be dimensionally wrong. I suppose that the full relation must be

<br /> \rho_r = \frac{\pi^2}{30} g_* \frac{(kT)^4}{(hc)^3}<br />

and this way the relation would be dimensionally correct. But when I put the values on it I get

<br /> \rho_r = 2.88 * 10^{-22} J/cm^3 = 3.20 * 10^{-36} g/cm^3<br />

and this is by far wrong. I have spend so much time around this that I am starting to get frustrated!
Thanks in advance

 

[nrqed]

Homework Statement

Reading about the raditation dominated era I saw that the radiation energy density today was given by:

<br /> \rho_r = \frac{\pi^2}{30} g_* T^4 = 8.09 * 10^{-34} g/cm^3<br />

where g_*=3.36 is the degree of freedom of the radiation (equivalent) and T=2.75 K is the CBR temperature today.

The problem is that they don't give me the exact expression and so this relation seems to be dimensionally wrong. I suppose that the full relation must be

<br /> \rho_r = \frac{\pi^2}{30} g_* \frac{(kT)^4}{(hc)^3}<br />

and this way the relation would be dimensionally correct. But when I put the values on it I get

<br /> \rho_r = 2.88 * 10^{-22} J/cm^3 = 3.20 * 10^{-36} g/cm^3<br />

and this is by far wrong. I have spend so much time around this that I am starting to get frustrated!
Thanks in advance

If you use \hbar instead of "h" in your equation, it works out (the result is (2 \pi)^3 times larger).

Patrick

 

[Magister]

Humm! You mean:
<br /> \rho_r = \frac{\pi^2}{30} g_* \frac{(kT)^4}{(\hbar c)^3} (2\pi)^3<br />

Yes, in fact it works out but does this make any sense? Is this because that in natural units is the \hbar that is equal to 1 instead of h?

Thanks a lot by the way!

 

[nrqed]

Humm! You mean:
<br /> \rho_r = \frac{\pi^2}{30} g_* \frac{(kT)^4}{(\hbar c)^3} (2\pi)^3<br />

Yes, in fact it works out but does this make any sense? Is this because that in natural units is the \hbar that is equal to 1 instead of h?

Thanks a lot by the way!

EDIT : No, this is not what I mean You don't have to put in the extra factor of (2 pi)^3. I mean
<br /> \rho_r = \frac{\pi^2}{30} g_* \frac{(kT)^4}{(\hbar c)^3}<br />
This result will be (2 pi)^3 times larger than the equation written with only h.


That's what I mean, yes. Usually, by "natural units", people mean that they set \hbar equal to 1, not "h". Of course, one could also decide to set h to one instead, but this is not what is usually done.

You are very welcome.

Patrick