Problem with source term in qft

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DrDu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qft Source Term
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the interaction of a static point source with a massless field in quantum field theory (QFT). It highlights that a scalar source term, such as \(\delta(x) \phi(x)\), induces constant acceleration in a system modeled as a linear chain of masses, leading to an unbounded Hamiltonian. This phenomenon is identified as an infrared catastrophe, which arises from the excitation of increasingly longer wavelength waves. The conversation suggests that controlling this issue may involve ensuring the integral of the source density over space is neutral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics
  • Knowledge of infrared catastrophes in physics
  • Basic concepts of Hamiltonian dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of scalar source terms in quantum field theory
  • Research infrared catastrophes and their resolutions in QFT
  • Explore the role of Lagrangians in particle interactions, specifically for electrons and photons
  • Examine the continuum limit in classical mechanics and its application to QFT
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in quantum field theory and its mathematical foundations.

DrDu
Science Advisor
Messages
6,423
Reaction score
1,004
I have a problem understanding the effect of source terms in qft.
I am interested in understanding how a static point source will interact with a
massless field.
Let me consider a simple example of a linear chain of masses coupled by some springs.
In the continuum limit, the Lagrangian of that model will only depend on the derivatives of the displacement of the masses and not on the absolute displacements. In qft such a field is called "massless". Now a scalar source term e.g. [tex]\delta(x) \phi(x)[/tex] corresponds to a force acting on one mass point on the chain. Obviously, this will lead to constant acceleration of the system (or of ever growing parts of it). The Hamiltonian will fail to be bounded from below.
Apparently, adding a source term leads to a catastrophe. This will happen also for the discrete chain, so it isn't a problem of renormalization.
I guess this is what is called an infrared catastrophe as it involves the excitation of waves of longer and longer wavelength. How is this controlled in qft?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I shall try to give an answer myself: Probably by demanding that the integral over space of the source density vanishes, i.e., considering only over-all neutral systems.
However, e.g. in qft people write down Lagrangians for the interaction of electrons and photons without caring about the positive counter-charges.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K