What is a "source term" & what is it physically in QFT?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter "Don't panic!"
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qft Term
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of a "source term" in the context of differential equations and quantum field theory (QFT). Participants explore the physical interpretation of source terms, particularly in relation to the Klein-Gordon equation and the Feynman propagator for scalar fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the function ##f(x)## in an inhomogeneous ODE is called a "source term" and seeks to understand its physical interpretation in relation to the behavior of the solution ##y(x)##.
  • Another participant suggests that in many scenarios, the source term can be viewed as a force that modifies the system's behavior when activated, using the example of a weight on a spring.
  • A participant references the importance of studying electrodynamics to understand wave equations and field sources, implying that this background is essential for grasping the concept of source terms in QFT.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about their understanding of scalar fields and attempts to relate the source term ##J(x)## in QFT to classical concepts, such as electric current density sourcing a magnetic field.
  • Another participant draws a parallel between classical mechanics and the role of the source term in QFT, suggesting that a force acting on a mass can be analogous to the source term influencing the propagation of a scalar field.
  • A participant mentions a specific QFT book that emphasizes the relevance of source terms, indicating that literature exists to further explore this topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and interpretation of source terms, with some drawing parallels to classical physics while others emphasize the need for a solid foundation in electrodynamics. No consensus is reached on the physical interpretation of source terms in QFT.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference different educational backgrounds and experiences, which may influence their understanding of the topic. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in relating classical and quantum concepts.

"Don't panic!"
Messages
600
Reaction score
8
Given an inhomogeneous ODE of the form $$a_{n}(x)y^{(n)}(x)+a_{n-1}(x)y^{(n-1)}(x)+\cdots +a_{2}(x)y''(x)+a_{1}(x)y'(x)+a_{0}(x)y(x)=f(x)$$ where ##y^{(n)}(x)\equiv \frac{d^{n}y(x)}{dx^{n}}##, why is the function ##f(x)## on the right hand side referred to as a "source term" ? In what way does it source left hand side (or the function ##y(x)##)?
The reason I ask as in quantum field theory the Feynman propagator for a scalar field ##\phi (x)## can be derived by considering the Klein-Gordon equation with a so-called "source term" ##J(x)##, i.e. $$\left(\Box +m^{2}\right)\phi (x)=J(x)$$ where ##\Box\equiv\eta^{\mu\nu}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x^{\mu}\partial x^{\nu}}##. I'm unsure as to how this should be interpreted physically, or whether it is just a useful mathematical trick that bears no physical interpretation?! (I understand the derivation of the Feynman propagator for a scalar field from this, but I'm unsure how to motivate the introduction of the source term ##J(x)## on the right hand side of the K-G equation?!)

N.B. I originally posted this in the differential equations forum, but it was suggested that perhaps it would be more suited in this forum, given what the question is relating to.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Don't panic!" said:
why is the function f(x) on the right hand side referred to as a "source term" ?
In many simple but paradigmatic situations it is a force switched on at time ##t=0##. For ##t<0## the system is on its own, for ##t>0## it responds to the force. Thus the force is the source of the modified behavior. For example, you put a weight on a spring and it starts oscillating.
 
Did you study electrodynamics? I hope so, this comes before QM which comes before QFT (in a normal university syllabus), so this discipline should teach you about wave equations and field sources.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
dextercioby said:
Did you study electrodynamics? I hope so, this comes before QM which comes before QFT (in a normal university syllabus), so this discipline should teach you about wave equations and field sources.

Yes, I did (although it's been a while since I learned it), but I guess I was just viewing the scalar field differently for some reason :-\

For example, I get that in classical electrodynamics the electric current density ##\mathbf{J}## (along with a time varying electric field) sources a spatially varying magnetic field. Can one translate this over to QFT to say that ##J(x)## sources a propagating scalar field of mass ##m##?

(Could one think of it classically in terms of a force, e.g. from Newton's 2nd law we could say that a force ##\mathbf{f}## sources an acceleration ##\mathbf{a}## of a particle of mass ##m##, i.e. ##\mathbf{f}=m\mathbf{a}##? Would be fair to say that this is the classical analogue of ##\left(\Box +m^{2}\right)\phi (x)=J(x)##? [In this sense, ##J(x)## would be acting on the field ##\phi## sourcing a propagation in the field]).
 
Last edited:
Electrodynamics explains to you what a source term is. A QFT book emphasizing the relevance was written by David Bailin and Alexander Love. "Introduction to gauge Field theory", IOP, 1993.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K