Problems changing my whole outlook on math

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter A.J.710
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges faced by a participant in adapting to a new approach to simplifying fractions in their online math course. The focus is on the necessity of factoring entire expressions rather than simplifying term-by-term, which contrasts with their previous learning experiences. The conversation includes requests for clarification and examples related to this method.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion over the new method of factoring entire numerators and denominators instead of simplifying fractions term-by-term, as they were taught previously.
  • Another participant provides an example involving the expression \(\frac{x^2 - 1}{x-1}\) to illustrate the need to consider the entire expression for simplification.
  • Several participants emphasize the importance of practice and understanding through doing, suggesting that repeated exposure to examples will aid comprehension.
  • There are discussions about the correct notation for mathematical expressions, with participants pointing out the need for parentheses to avoid ambiguity in written math.
  • One participant mentions that the new learning approach requires understanding repeated factors in expressions, which may not have been covered in prior education.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of factoring and the need for clarity in mathematical notation. However, there is no consensus on the best way to approach learning this new method, as some participants are still grappling with the concepts.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential for misunderstanding due to notation issues and the varying levels of familiarity with the new method among participants. The discussion does not resolve the confusion experienced by the original poster.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students transitioning to new methods of simplifying fractions, educators looking for insights into student challenges, and anyone interested in mathematical notation and clarity in communication.

A.J.710
Messages
56
Reaction score
1
I have been doing some problems today on my online math course and the preferred way of doing it is changing the whole concept of fractions I've learned my entire life.

Normally I would go about doing numbers individually in a polynomial for example 25a^2/25a would be just a then move onto the next set of numbers.

Now the course wants me to factor the entire numerator and factor the entire denominator and then simplify.

I'd just like some explanation behind this because I was never taught to do this before and it just has me a little confused.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A.J.710 said:
I have been doing some problems today on my online math course and the preferred way of doing it is changing the whole concept of fractions I've learned my entire life.

Normally I would go about doing numbers individually in a polynomial for example 25a^2/25a would be just a then move onto the next set of numbers.

Now the course wants me to factor the entire numerator and factor the entire denominator and then simplify.

I'd just like some explanation behind this because I was never taught to do this before and it just has me a little confused.

If you are thinking of an example like
[tex]\frac{x^2 - 1}{x-1} = x+1[/tex]
then you can see that you just cannot look at the numerator ##x^2 - 1## term-by-term; to get anywhere, you need to look at the thing in its entirety. What is happening is that we can write ##x^2 - 1 = (x-1)(x+1)##, and then we can cancel out the ##x-1## factors from both the numerator and denominator.

There are several aspects involved in learning such material. (1) You need to practice---do lots of examples. (2) Understanding comes through doing, so even if you are unsure initially, you can just go ahead and apply the steps without, maybe, understanding WHY they work. After you have seen several instances you should be in a better position to appreciate the procedure and what it can do for you.

Here is another example for you to try (with broad hints provided):
[tex]\text{simplify the fraction } \frac{2x^2 + 6x -20}{x^2 +4x -12}.[/tex]
Note that the numerator can be written as ##2x^2 + 6x - 20 = 2(x-2)(x+5)## and the denominator can be written as ##x^2 + 4x - 12 = (x-2)(x+6)##.
 
Ray Vickson said:
If you are thinking of an example like
[tex]\frac{x^2 - 1}{x-1} = x+1[/tex]
then you can see that you just cannot look at the numerator ##x^2 - 1## term-by-term; to get anywhere, you need to look at the thing in its entirety. What is happening is that we can write ##x^2 - 1 = (x-1)(x+1)##, and then we can cancel out the ##x-1## factors from both the numerator and denominator.

There are several aspects involved in learning such material. (1) You need to practice---do lots of examples. (2) Understanding comes through doing, so even if you are unsure initially, you can just go ahead and apply the steps without, maybe, understanding WHY they work. After you have seen several instances you should be in a better position to appreciate the procedure and what it can do for you.

Here is another example for you to try (with broad hints provided):
[tex]\text{simplify the fraction } \frac{2x^2 + 6x -20}{x^2 +4x -12}.[/tex]
Note that the numerator can be written as ##2x^2 + 6x - 20 = 2(x-2)(x+5)## and the denominator can be written as ##x^2 + 4x - 12 = (x-2)(x+6)##.

Ok I'll keep practicing, but as for the problem you just gave me. would that simplify down to

2x + 10/x + 6
 
A.J.710 said:
Ok I'll keep practicing, but as for the problem you just gave me. would that simplify down to

2x + 10/x + 6
What you wrote is different from what you meant.

This is what you wrote:
$$2x + \frac {10} x + 6$$

To indicate that 2x + 10 is the numerator and that x + 6 is the denominator, you have to use parentheses, like this: (2x + 10)/(x + 6).
 
Mark44 said:
What you wrote is different from what you meant.

This is what you wrote:
$$2x + \frac {10} x + 6$$

To indicate that 2x + 10 is the numerator and that x + 6 is the denominator, you have to use parentheses, like this: (2x + 10)/(x + 6).

Sorry about that. I'm not used to writing math on a computer like this.
 
It helps tremendously if you use parentheses to clarify expressions:

(2x+10)/(x+6) rather than 2x + 10/x + 6, which might be read as "2 times x plus 10 over x plus 6"
 
In addition, what you wrote as 25a2/25a also needs parentheses. Without them, it would be interpreted as (25a2/25) * a.

The correct and unambiguous way to write this expression is 25a2/(25a).
 
A.J.710 said:
Ok I'll keep practicing, but as for the problem you just gave me. would that simplify down to

2x + 10/x + 6

You have the right idea, but your answer is badly wriiten. What you have written means [tex]2x + \frac{10}{x} + 6[/tex] (when read and parsed using standard rules). If you mean to write
[tex]\frac{2x + 10}{x+6}[/tex] then you need to use parentheses, like this: (2x+10)/(x+6). When written like that it would be 100% correct.
 
How do you guys do the fraction thing? So it looks like it's on paper?
 
  • #12
A.J.710 wrote this:

I'd just like some explanation behind this because I was never taught to do this before and it just has me a little confused.

You are now supposed to learn MORE than what you were taught before. The numbers and expressions that you will be given to solve in your instruction and also in real life can have repeated factors in the number or numbers which you will work with and simplify.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K