Problems in classical electrodynamics: Only for point-like particles?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter greypilgrim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classical electrodynamics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the unresolved issues in classical electrodynamics, particularly the Abraham–Lorentz force, which arise specifically from the assumption of point-like particles. Participants agree that these mathematical inconsistencies are tied to classical point charges and suggest that transitioning to continuous charge densities eliminates these difficulties. Furthermore, the conversation highlights the inherent contradictions in expecting classical electrodynamics to apply to quantized charges, emphasizing the non-existence of classical point particles as a significant factor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical electrodynamics principles
  • Familiarity with the Abraham–Lorentz force
  • Knowledge of charge density concepts
  • Basic grasp of quantum mechanics and its implications on classical theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Abraham–Lorentz force in classical electrodynamics
  • Explore the transition from point-like particles to continuous charge distributions
  • Investigate the relationship between classical electrodynamics and quantum mechanics
  • Study the mathematical formulations of charge densities in electromagnetic theory
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those specializing in classical electrodynamics and quantum mechanics, as well as researchers exploring the foundations of particle physics and the limitations of classical theories.

greypilgrim
Messages
581
Reaction score
44
Hi.

I was surprised when I first read that there's quite a couple of unsolved problems in classical electrodynamics, such as the Abraham–Lorentz force. I have a couple of questions about that:
  1. Do those difficulties only appear for exact point-like particles? Do they all vanish with continuous charge densities (even if they might be localized around a very small, yet finite, region in space)?
  2. If yes: Isn't the assumption of point-like particles or also quantized charge already quantum, so why would we even expect classical electrodynamics to hold?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
greypilgrim said:
Do those difficulties only appear for exact point-like particles? Do they all vanish with continuous charge densities (even if they might be localized around a very small, yet finite, region in space)?
As far as I know, yes. All of the mathematical inconsistencies stem from classical point charges.

greypilgrim said:
Isn't the assumption of point-like particles or also quantized charge already quantum, so why would we even expect classical electrodynamics to hold?
I agree. To me these issues speak more to the non-existence of classical point particles than anything else.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
540
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K