So I'm learning about Ring Theory and have gotten to Ideals. My book tells me that the product of two ideals I and J or a ring R (standard * and + operations) is the set of all finite sums of elements of the form ij where i is in I and j is in J. I'm having trouble coming up with an example as to why we can't just define the product of I and J to be just the elements of the form ij (not any finite sum).(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The definition without the sum seems to work for the rings i've tried (R being the integers Z, and ideals being nZ and mZ for different m and n, for example). I suspect it breaks down with matrices, or maybe polynomials, but i'm having trouble nailing down a specific example. Guidance would be much appreciated. Thanks!

- JD

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Product Of Ideals - Why is the sum necessary?

Loading...

Similar Threads for Product Ideals necessary | Date |
---|---|

I Direct Products of Modules ... Canonical Injections ... | Apr 3, 2018 |

I Direct Products of Modules ...Another Question ... ... | Mar 31, 2018 |

Product of Ideals makes no sense to me | Apr 30, 2012 |

Ideals of direct product of rings are direct product of respective ideals? | Sep 27, 2008 |

Product of Ideals | Jun 30, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**