Progressions and series prove this

  • Thread starter Thread starter utkarshakash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
utkarshakash
Gold Member
Messages
852
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


If [itex]x_1,x_2,x_3...x_n[/itex] are in H.P. then prove that [itex]x_1x_2+x_2x_3+x_3x_4...+x_{n-1}x_n=(n-1)x_1x_n[/itex]

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


Since [itex]x_1,x_2,x_3...x_n[/itex] are in H.P. therefore
[itex]\frac{1}{x_1},\frac{1}{x_2},\frac{1}{x_3}...,\frac{1}{x_n}[/itex] will be in A.P. Now common difference of this A.P.
[itex]d=\dfrac{\frac{1}{x_n}-\frac{1}{x_1}}{n-1} \\<br /> x_1x_n=\dfrac{x_1-x_n}{d(n-1)}\\<br /> (n-1)x_1x_n=\dfrac{x_1-x_n}{d}[/itex]

Looks like I've arrived at the R.H.S. But what about LHS?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
utkarshakash said:

Homework Statement


If [itex]x_1,x_2,x_3...x_n[/itex] are in Harmonic Progression. then prove that [itex]x_1x_2+x_2x_3+x_3x_4...+x_{n-1}x_n=(n-1)x_1x_n[/itex]

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


Since [itex]x_1,x_2,x_3...x_n[/itex] are in H.P. therefore
[itex]\frac{1}{x_1},\frac{1}{x_2},\frac{1}{x_3}...,\frac{1}{x_n}[/itex] will be in A.P. Now common difference of this A.P.
[itex]d=\dfrac{\frac{1}{x_n}-\frac{1}{x_1}}{n-1} \\<br /> x_1x_n=\dfrac{x_1-x_n}{d(n-1)}\\<br /> (n-1)x_1x_n=\dfrac{x_1-x_n}{d}[/itex]

Looks like I've arrived at the R.H.S. But what about LHS?
This the second one of your problems I've worked on. Just so you know, you need to write out your acronyms. No one has ANY clue what you mean if you don't do it. I was tempted to write something about Hewlett-Packard. :-p

Alright. [itex]x_1x_2+x_2x_3+x_3x_4+...+x_{n-1}x_{n}[/itex] is the same thing as saying [itex]x_{1}(\frac{x_{1}}{1+d}) + (\frac{x_{1}}{1+d})(\frac{x_{1}}{1+2d})+...+(\frac{x_{1}}{1+(n-2)})(\frac{x_{1}}{1+(n-1)})[/itex].

You can probably figure it out from here. :wink:
 
Mandelbroth said:
This the second one of your problems I've worked on. Just so you know, you need to write out your acronyms. No one has ANY clue what you mean if you don't do it. I was tempted to write something about Hewlett-Packard. :-p

Alright. [itex]x_1x_2+x_2x_3+x_3x_4+...+x_{n-1}x_{n}[/itex] is the same thing as saying [itex]x_{1}(\frac{x_{1}}{1+d}) + (\frac{x_{1}}{1+d})(\frac{x_{1}}{1+2d})+...+(\frac{x_{1}}{1+(n-2)})(\frac{x_{1}}{1+(n-1)})[/itex].

You can probably figure it out from here. :wink:

Hey, do you see my title. It says 'Progressions and series prove this'? And I don't understand how can you relate Hewlett-Packard with progressions and series?:confused:It's not even a mathematical term. OK I will do expand my acronyms in future.

Returning to my problem I did not understand how did you write [itex]x_2=\dfrac{x_1}{1+d}[/itex] and so on.
 
I get [itex]x_2=\dfrac{x_1}{1+x_1d}[/itex] Looks like you missed the x1 in each of your denominator.
 
Last edited:
utkarshakash said:
Hey, do you see my title. It says 'Progressions and series prove this'? And I don't understand how can you relate Hewlett-Packard with progressions and series?:confused:It's not even a mathematical term. OK I will do expand my acronyms in future.

Returning to my problem I did not understand how did you write [itex]x_2=\dfrac{x_1}{1+d}[/itex] and so on.

Hint: if
[tex]\frac{1}{x_i} - \frac{1}{x_{i+1}} = r[/tex] for i = 1,2, ..., n-1 we have
[tex]x_2 - x_1 = r x_1 x_2, \: x_3 - x_2 = r \, x_2 x_3, \ldots .[/tex] What does that give you?

RGV
 
Last edited:
Ray Vickson said:
Hint: if
[tex]\frac{1}{x_i} - \frac{1}{x_{i+1}} = r[/tex] for i = 1,2, ..., n-1 we have
[tex]x_2 - x_1 = r x_1 x_2, \: x_3 - x_2 = r \, x_2 x_3, \ldots .[/tex] What does that give you?

RGV

Thanks. It solved my problem.