Projectile Motion: Finding the correct angle for a launch

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a projectile motion problem involving a motorcycle jump across a canyon with a vertical drop of 15 meters and a horizontal distance of 69.4 meters. The original poster seeks to determine the correct launch angle for a desired flight time of 3 seconds.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of kinematic equations to relate horizontal and vertical motion. There is a focus on the implications of using the range formula, which assumes equal initial and final heights, and the need to adjust for the height difference in this scenario.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem without relying on the range formula. There is an acknowledgment of the original poster's misunderstanding regarding the direction of motion and the signs in the equations. The discussion includes attempts to clarify the calculations for vertical and horizontal components of velocity.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly interpreting the height drop and the implications for the equations used. There is an emphasis on ensuring that the signs in the equations reflect the physical situation of the jump.

Simon777
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A Hollywood daredevil plans to jump the canyon shown in the figure on a motorcycle. There is a 15. m drop and the horizontal distance originally planned was 60. m but it turns out the canyon is really 69.4 m across. If he desires a 3.0-second flight time, what is the correct angle for his launch ramp (deg)?


Homework Equations


vx = vxo

x − xo = (vox)t

(vy) = (vyo) − gt

y − yo = (voy)t −(1/2)g t^2

Range =((vo^2)/g) sin(2θ)

The Attempt at a Solution


x − xo = (vox)t
69.4m = (vox)(3s)
23.13 m/s = vox

Range =((vo^2)/g) sin(2θ)
69.4m ={ (23.13^2 m/s)/9.81 m/s^2 } sin(2θ)
θ = error
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simon777 said:
Range =((vo^2)/g) sin(2θ)

This formula is valid when the initial and final heights are the same. It is not true now, as there is a 15 m drop.

ehild
 
ehild said:
This formula is valid when the initial and final heights are the same. It is not true now, as there is a 15 m drop.

ehild

Didn't realize this formula had that limitation. How would you find the correct angle without it? I have no other formulas involving theta.
 
You have the formulae

x=v0xt
y=y0+v0yt-g/2 t2.

You know t, the horizontal distance and the height from where the motorcycle jumps (15 m) with respect to the final height (zero). Can you get v0y?
If you have both the x and y components of the velocity, can you find its angle with the positive x axis?

ehild
 
ehild said:
You have the formulae

x=v0xt
y=y0+v0yt-g/2 t2.

You know t, the horizontal distance and the height from where the motorcycle jumps (15 m) with respect to the final height (zero). Can you get v0y?
If you have both the x and y components of the velocity, can you find its angle with the positive x axis?

ehild

I went that route at first and ended up with a wrong answer. I've checked my calculations 5 times and keep coming up with the same wrong angle so if you wouldn't mind double checking me, I'd appreciate it.

y − yo = (voy)t −(1/2)g t^2
15m = (voy) (3s) - (1/2) (9.81m/s^2)(3s)^2
59.145 = (voy) (3s)
voy = 19.7 m/s

x − xo = (vox)t
69.4m = (vox)(3s)
23.13 m/s = vox

To find the angle I used:
tan^-1 of (19.715/23.13) = 40.44 degrees
 
Simon777 said:
y − yo = (voy)t −(1/2)g t^2
15m = (voy) (3s) - (1/2) (9.81m/s^2)(3s)^2

The problem says that the motorcycle drops 15 m. Your formula means that it raises as your final position is 15 m higher than the initial one. Correct it.

ehild
 
ehild said:
The problem says that the motorcycle drops 15 m. Your formula means that it raises as your final position is 15 m higher than the initial one. Correct it.

ehild

I finally see where I went wrong. I chose down as the positive direction for y to not have to deal with negative numbers, hence the positive acceleration and positive 15m.

Where this went wrong is that the formula already factors a negative downward acceleration into it with the -(1/2)gt^2 so the downward direction has to be negative.

Thank you so much for helping me realize this.

I ended up with the right answer of 22.8 degrees.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K