Projectile trajectory problem with constraint

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a projectile motion problem where a ball must pass through a hoop on its downward path, requiring the calculation of total x-displacement, launch angle, and flight time without using the range formula. Participants emphasize treating the launch angle as an unknown and suggest analyzing equations to meet the problem's conditions. A method akin to guessing angles, similar to a game of Battleship, is recommended for finding a solution. Forum rules prohibit complete solutions, allowing only hints and guidance to help the original poster understand the problem better. Overall, the focus is on encouraging independent problem-solving while providing support.
jacksmith2296
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://imgur.com/RDMG4Pj
Link to drawn out problem^

The ball goes through the hoop NOT at the peak, but rather on it's downward path. It's asking for the total x-displacement, launch angle (theta), and the total flight time. It must me solved WITHOUT using the range formula. The landing point is also .25 meters up, so it lands at the same height it was launched from.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm completely lost without theta; thanks for your help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
jacksmith2296 said:

Homework Statement


http://imgur.com/RDMG4Pj
Link to drawn out problem^

The ball goes through the hoop NOT at the peak, but rather on it's downward path. It's asking for the total x-displacement, launch angle (theta), and the total flight time. It must me solved WITHOUT using the range formula. The landing point is also .25 meters up, so it lands at the same height it was launched from.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm completely lost without theta; thanks for your help.
Why can't you write the regular projectile motion equations? That's where the range formula ultimately comes from.

You treat the launch angle as an unknown to start with, and then you analyze your equations to see if the end of the trajectory satisfies the conditions of going thru the hoop and landing 0.5 m down range at the indicated height. You can always treat this like a game of Battleship, where you guess values of the initial angle and see if the ball hits the target. A problem like this could easily be set up on a spread sheet.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
SteamKing said:
Why can't you write the regular projectile motion equations? That's where the range formula ultimately comes from.

You treat the launch angle as an unknown to start with, and then you analyze your equations to see if the end of the trajectory satisfies the conditions of going thru the hoop and landing 0.5 m down range at the indicated height. You can always treat this like a game of Battleship, where you guess values of the initial angle and see if the ball hits the target. A problem like this could easily be set up on a spread sheet.
Will you please work it out? I'm honestly just lost, and I think I'd understand better if I could look at the answer and work my way through.
 
jacksmith2296 said:
Will you please work it out? I'm honestly just lost, and I think I'd understand better if I could look at the answer and work my way through.
Sorry but that's not allowed by the forum rules. Helpers are not allowed to completely solve homework problems for other members.

They can provide hints and suggestions, or point out errors or where the chosen method has gone off-track, but they can't do your work for you.

Edit: Please note that I've changed the thread title so that helpers can better recognize the subject matter of the problem.
 
jacksmith2296 said:
Will you please work it out? I'm honestly just lost, and I think I'd understand better if I could look at the answer and work my way through.
Sorry, that's against the rules for the HW forums here at PF. You've got to show some effort at solving your own HW problems.
 
gneill said:
Sorry but that's not allowed by the forum rules. Helpers are not allowed to completely solve homework problems for other members.

They can provide hints and suggestions, or point out errors or where the chosen method has gone off-track, but they can't do your work for you.

Edit: Please note that I've changed the thread title so that helpers can better recognize the subject matter of the problem.
Sorry I really didn't know
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
26K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K