Classical mechanics: Projectile Motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the projectile motion of two projectiles launched simultaneously from the same height but at different angles relative to the horizontal. The original poster examines various aspects of their flight, including time in the air, horizontal range, and landing speed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to analyze the time of flight, horizontal range, and landing speed of two projectiles launched at different angles. Some participants question the assumptions made about the landing speed being the same for both projectiles, while others explore the implications of the parabolic paths of the projectiles.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the symmetry of projectile paths and the relationship between the velocities at different points. There is recognition of the importance of point "w" in understanding the trajectories, but no explicit consensus has been reached regarding the landing speed explanation.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the effects of initial velocity and launch angles on the projectiles' motion, while also grappling with the implications of gravitational acceleration on their trajectories. The discussion highlights the need for clarity on the relationship between the paths of the two projectiles.

REVIANNA
Messages
71
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Two projectiles are launched simultaneously from the same point above the flat terrain. The initial speeds of the projectiles are the same. Each projectile’s velocity makes the same angle with the horizontal. However, projectile A is launched above the horizontal and projectile B is below the horizontal.

1437128522312439.png


Consider the entire flights of the projectiles. State which of the projectiles has greater:

1-time in the air

It's A
because
x_f = x_i+v sin(theta) t_f-(0.5*g*(t_f^2))

for A : 0=x_i + v sin(theta) t_f-(0.5*g*(t_f^2))

so t_f =sqrt ((2 v sin(theta)+x_y)/g)

for B : 0=x_i - v sin(theta) t_f-(0.5*g*(t_f^2))

so t_f =sqrt ((2 v sin(theta)-x_y)/g)

and to put it more simply the simulation picture shows it.

2-horizontal range
since the horizontal velocity vector is constant and equal for both A and B
and time in the air is more for A
A's horizontal range is obviously larger.

3-Landing speed
this is what I thought -
B is thrown with a downward vertical velocity so it would get increased as the acceleration due to gravity is also downwards
and A is thrown with a upward vertical velocity so it would get decreased as the acceleration due to gravity is downwards
and the horizontal velocities are equal so the landing speed of B would be greater.

but the answer says that the landing speed is same for both A and B.
why is it this way? what am I missing?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Notice that there is a horizontal line extending to the right from the cannon. If you extend that line further to the right, it will cross the path of A - call that intersection point "w".
What do you suppose the velocity of A is when it crosses point w? Where do you suppose path "A" peaks relative to the cannon and point "w"? Since A is following a parabolic path, how do you suppose the and of Path A at the gun and the angle of path A at point "w" are related?

There are other ways to see this. If you launch an ball into the air so that it is traveling at 50mph as it leaves you hand 5 feet from the ground, how fast do you think it will be traveling downward when you try to catch it again - with your hand 5 feet above the ground? Assuming no losses to air friction. If it is anything other than 50MPH, where would the extra energy have come from or gone to?
 
at w:
velocity will be -v*sin(theta)
and angle will simply be -theta

at the point where A strikes the ground
vertical velocity= - v*sin(theta)- gt
and angle will be :
arctan((-vsin(theta)-gt)/vcos(theta))

.Scott said:
Where do you suppose path "A" peaks relative to the cannon and point "w"
I don't understand what you mean.
 
REVIANNA said:
at w:
velocity will be -v*sin(theta)
and angle will simply be -theta
This much is all you needed. If you get this, then you should realize that the remainder of the A path is exactly like the B path.
REVIANNA said:
I don't understand what you mean.
I was hoping that you would recognize that the parabolic shape was left-right symmetric between the cannon and point w. It we take the cannon to be at 0, point w/2 would be the midpoint between the cannon and w, so it would be the peak location of the A.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: REVIANNA
I don't know why I could not see that
What I was missing was that they have the same trajectory once A crosses pt w and the extra time and longer horizontal range is just because of the path before it crosses W.
And yes its symmetric about the peak that's why it takes the same time to reach the bottom (W) as it took to reach the peak

and because they have the same initial velocity and theta and g they have the same LANDING SPEED.
W is an imp pt!

thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
27K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K