Projection Operators: Explaining |m|2*|m|2 = |m|4

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Somali_Physicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators Projection
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of projection operators in quantum mechanics, specifically the expression |m|² * |m|² = |m|⁴. Participants explore the implications of projection operators, their mathematical representations in Dirac notation, and the conditions under which these operators behave as expected.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe the projection operator Pm = |m> = |m|².
  • Others argue that the projection operator behaves as Pm * Pm = Pm, which leads to the confusion regarding the expression |m|² * |m|² = |m|⁴.
  • A participant suggests that writing the expression in Dirac notation clarifies the situation, indicating that Pm * Pm = |m>
  • Some participants question the assumption that = 1, leading to discussions about the implications of this assumption on the projection operator.
  • There is a mention of constructing a projection operator for a normalized state |ψ⟩, which is only valid if ⟨ψ|ψ⟩ = 1.
  • Another participant points out that the matrix representation of a projection operator can have elements other than 1 and 0, suggesting that the context of the transformation matters.
  • Some participants express confusion about the commutativity of the operators involved and the implications for their calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the assumptions regarding the normalization of states and the properties of projection operators. There is no consensus on the implications of these assumptions, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the conditions under which the expressions hold true.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of normalization in the context of projection operators and the potential for confusion arising from different representations and assumptions about the states involved.

Somali_Physicist
Messages
117
Reaction score
13
Take a projection operatorPm=|m><m|
However if the ket of m is a column matrix of m x 1 and its bra the complex conjugate with 1 x m length
therefore <m|m> = |m|2
since the m here is the same since projection operator is the same.
if A is a matrix
B = A
A*B=B*A

but Pm*Pm = Pm (Projection operator)
but this makes no sense as |m|2*|m|2 = |m|4

Can anyone explain?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Writte it out in Dirac notation as you already have done and it pops out immediately.
 
Dr Transport said:
Writte it out in Dirac notation as you already have done and it pops out immediately.
Pm*Pm=(|m><m|)(|m><m|) = |m><m|m><m|=|m><m| only if |m|^2 = 1
 
Somali_Physicist said:
m here is the same the projection operator is the same
Same as what ?
Note that <m|m> = 1 so that indeed P2=P (and your |m| = 1)

Page 5 (page number 59) here
 
Last edited:
BvU said:
Same as what ?
Note that <m|m> = I so that indeed P2=P (and your |m| = 1)
hmm but let's take a bra <m| is a row matrix of 2 elements in the dual vector space V*
and |m> is the corresponding column matrix of two elements in the vector of vector space V
now no matter which configuration i multiply these two things ( or which ever way they act on each other)
the corressponding matrix multiplication is the same value.

<m|m>=|m><m| = |m|^2
or is this system essentially assuming the magnitude is 1?
 
Somali_Physicist said:
Take a projection operatorPm=|m><m|
However if the ket of m is a column matrix of m x 1 and its bra the complex conjugate with 1 x m length
therefore <m|m> = |m|2

Where are you getting that from? Let's take a simple example:

##|\psi\rangle = \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right)##

(I don't want to use ##|m\rangle## because that's mixing up the number of components with the index of the component.)

Then ##\langle \psi|\psi \rangle =\left( \begin{array} \\ 1 & 0 \end{array} \right) \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) = 1##

The projection operator ##P_\psi = \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 & 0 \end{array} \right) = \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{array} \right)##

You can see that ##(P_\psi)^2 = P_\psi##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Somali_Physicist and BvU
Somali_Physicist said:
hmm but let's take a bra <m| is a row matrix of 2 elements in the dual vector space V*
and |m> is the corresponding column matrix of two elements in the vector of vector space V
now no matter which configuration i multiply these two things ( or which ever way they act on each other)
the corressponding matrix multiplication is the same value.

<m|m>=|m><m| = |m|^2
or is this system essentially assuming the magnitude is 1?

Yes. ##|\psi\rangle \langle \psi|## is a projection operator only if ##\langle \psi|\psi \rangle = 1##
 
stevendaryl said:
Where are you getting that from? Let's take a simple example:

##|\psi\rangle = \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right)##

(I don't want to use ##|m\rangle## because that's mixing up the number of components with the index of the component.)

Then ##\langle \psi|\psi \rangle =\left( \begin{array} \\ 1 & 0 \end{array} \right) \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) = 1##

The projection operator ##P_\psi = \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 & 0 \end{array} \right) = \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{array} \right)##

You can see that ##(P_\psi)^2 = P_\psi##
Ahh thanks that explains it, i assumed commutativity!
 
stevendaryl said:
Yes. ##|\psi\rangle \langle \psi|## is a projection operator only if ##\langle \psi|\psi \rangle = 1##
That also sorts my other conundrum.So for these transformations only can have 1s and 0s in it.The projection operator has the element at the Pm,m.My book used a value "n" at that position which i thought implied non 1 values.
 
  • #10
Somali_Physicist said:
That also sorts my other conundrum.So for these transformations only can have 1s and 0s in it.The projection operator has the element at the Pm,m.My book used a value "n" at that position which i thought implied non 1 values.
The matrix representation of a projection operator can have elements other than 1 and 0. Try construction the projection operator ##\hat{P}_{\psi}## for
$$
| \psi \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( |+\rangle + |-\rangle \right)
$$
in the ##\left\{ |+\rangle, |-\rangle \right\}## basis.
 
  • #11
Somali_Physicist said:
hmm but let's take a bra <m| is a row matrix of 2 elements in the dual vector space V*
and |m> is the corresponding column matrix of two elements in the vector of vector space V
now no matter which configuration i multiply these two things ( or which ever way they act on each other)
the corressponding matrix multiplication is the same value.

<m|m>=|m><m| = |m|^2
or is this system essentially assuming the magnitude is 1?
Projectors are idempotent in this sense
##\langle m |( |m\rangle\langle m |) m\rangle = 1## and inserting more projectors has no effect
##\langle m |(|m\rangle\langle m |m\rangle\langle m |) m\rangle = 1##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
9K