Projection Operators on Vector Spaces: Clarifying Mistakes

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter HenryGomes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators Projection
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the properties of linear projection operators in vector spaces, specifically addressing the confusion arising from two direct sum decompositions of a vector space V, represented as V=V_1⊕V_2 and V=V_1⊕V_2'. The key conclusion is that the equality P_2(v)=P_2(w) for vectors v and w not in the subspace V_1 is incorrect unless the difference v-w lies within V_1. The mistake stems from misunderstanding the conditions under which projection operators yield equivalent results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and subspaces
  • Familiarity with linear projection operators
  • Knowledge of direct sum decompositions
  • Basic linear algebra concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear projection operators in depth
  • Learn about direct sum decompositions in vector spaces
  • Explore the implications of subspace relationships in linear algebra
  • Investigate examples of projection operators in practical applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to vector spaces and projection operators.

HenryGomes
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Supposing we have a vector space V and a subspace V_1\subset V.
Suppose further that we have two different direct sum decompositions of the total space V=V_1\oplus V_2 and V_1\oplus V_2'. Given the linear projection operators P_1, P_2, P_1', P_2' onto these decompositions, we have that P_2\circ P_1=P_2\circ P_1'=0. But then we have that P_2(v)=P_2(P_1'+P_2')(v)=P_2 (P_2'(v)). Now, for v\notin V_1, given any w\notin V_1, we can find a decomposition such that P_2'(v)=w.
This gives the apparently wrong result that for any v,w\notin V_1, ~P_2(v)=P_2(w). Can anyone clarify the mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HenryGomes said:
Now, for v\notin V_1, given any w\notin V_1, we can find a decomposition such that P_2'(v)=w.
Can you elaborate on this?
 
Of course, I can't, because it's not true. Only if v-w\in V_1. I don't know from where I got that idea...
Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K