Proof Abelian Group: Consec Ints & No Follow w/2

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
pedrommp
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If [tex]G[/tex] is a group in which [tex](a.b)^i=a^i.b^i[/tex] for three consecutive integers [tex]i[/tex] for all [tex]a,b \in G[/tex] , show that [tex]G[/tex] is abelian.

Show that the conclusion does not follow if we assume the relation [tex](a.b)^i=a^i.b^i[/tex] for just two consecutive integers.

Homework Equations



The basic group identities

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, the first part i made :

Let j be the smallest of the three consecutive integers. Then we have that

[tex](a.b)^j = a^j.b^j[/tex]

[tex](a.b)^{j+1} = a^{j+1}.b^{j+1}[/tex] and

[tex](a.b)^{j+2} = a^{j+2}.b^{j+2}[/tex] for all [tex]a, b \in G[/tex]

Inverting the first equation and right multiplying it to the second equation implies

[tex]a.b = a^{j+1}.b^{j+1}.b^{-j}.a^{-j} = a^{j+1}.b.a^{-j}[/tex] hence

[tex]b.a^j = a^j.b[/tex]

Inverting the second equation and right multiplying it to the third equation gives

[tex]a.b = a^{j+2}.b^{j+2}.b^{-j-1}.a^{-j-1} = a^{j+2}.b.a^{-j-1}[/tex] hence

[tex]b.a^{j+1} = a^{j+1}.b[/tex]

Therefore [tex]a^{j+1}.b = b.a^{j+1} = b.a^{j}.a = a^{j}.b.a[/tex] and left multiplying by

[tex]a^{-j}[/tex] yields [tex]a.b = b.a[/tex] for arbitrary [tex]a, b \in G[/tex]

Hence G is abelian.

But the second i tried to find an example of non-abelian group that satisfies the relation for two consecutive integers with no success.
 
on Phys.org
I might be missing something, but have you tried the contrapositive for the second part?

That is, I am interpreting this question as: The relation (the one you described for 3 consecutive integers) holds if and only if G is abelian.

Did I interpret correctly? If so, I'd try to prove the contrapositive.
 
I think i got it, if i take [tex]S_3[/tex] then for all [tex]a , b \in S_3[/tex] we have

[tex](a.b)^0=e=e.e=a^0.b^0[/tex] and

[tex](a.b)^1=a^1.b^1[/tex]

Hence [tex](a.b)^i=a^i.b^i[/tex] for two consecutive integers but [tex]S_3[/tex] is not abelian.