Proof about compact metric spaces.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the properties of compact metric spaces, specifically demonstrating that for any compact metric space M and radius r > 0, there exists a finite set S within M such that every point in M is within r units of some point in S. Key concepts include the definitions of compactness, sequential compactness, and covering compactness. The discussion also clarifies that while closed subsets of compact spaces are compact, not all subsets retain this property, illustrated by the counterexample of the open interval (0, 1) within the closed interval [0, 1].

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of compact metric spaces
  • Familiarity with the definitions of sequential compactness and covering compactness
  • Knowledge of open covers and finite subcovers
  • Basic concepts of convergence in metric spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of compact metric spaces in detail
  • Learn about the Heine-Borel theorem and its implications for compactness
  • Explore examples of sequentially compact spaces and their characteristics
  • Investigate the relationship between open covers and compactness in metric spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying topology, and anyone interested in the properties of compact metric spaces and their applications in analysis.

Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
1. Let M be a compact metric space. If r>0, show that there is a finite set S in M such that every point of M is within r units of some point in S.



2. Relevant theorems & Definitions:

-Every compact set is closed and bounded.

-A subset S of a metric space M is sequentially compact if every sequence in S has a subsequence that converges to a limit in S.

-If every open covering of S reduces to a finite subcovering then we say that S is covering compact.




3. Attempt at the solution

To begin with I don't completely understand coverings. So I am unsure whether I should use the sequential definition or the covering definition. Could someone please explain coverings?

I also wondered if S is a subset of a compact metric space, does it follow that S is compact?

INFORMAL PROOF: Since M is compact, it follows that every sequence in M has a convergent subsequence in M. Need to show that for any point in M is within some distance from a point in S. Let m_{k_{j}} be such a subsequence. So for \epsilon>0 there exists N such that m_{k_{j}} is within \epsilon units of some point, call it m.

Not sure where to go from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the definition of compactness? Consider the collection {B(x, r) : x is in M and r > 0}.
 
Regarding your second question, this is not true. But it is true that a closed subspace of a compact space is itself compact.

Edit: a simple counterexample is the closed unit interval [0, 1] which is compact, but <0, 1> is a subset of [0, 1] which is not compact.
 
radou said:
What's the definition of compactness? Consider the collection {B(x, r) : x is in M and r > 0}.

The definition for sequential compactness is that for any sequence in M there is a subsequence which converges to some point in M.

If the collection {B(x,r)|x in M and r>0} is contained in M, could we construct some sequence which converges to the collection? I am not sure what you mean by this collection entirely.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K