Proof: Collision of a Ball with Parabolic Mirror Y^2=2px

  • Thread starter Thread starter neelakash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a ball moving parallel to the y-axis will always arrive at the focus of a parabolic mirror described by the equation y²=2px after an elastic collision. Participants explore the principles of reflection and the implications of the geometry of the parabola in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the analogy between the problem and the reflection of light in a parabolic mirror, questioning the applicability of Fermat's law and the least action principle. There are inquiries about the role of the angle of incidence and reflection, as well as the implications of the ball's trajectory relative to the mirror's focus.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the mechanics of the collision and the necessary conditions for the ball to reflect towards the focus. There is an ongoing exploration of the geometric properties of the parabola and the relationship between the incident and reflected angles. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being considered, particularly regarding the direction of the ball's motion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the direction of the ball's trajectory and its interaction with the parabolic mirror. There is also mention of assumptions about the negligible mass of the ball compared to the mirror and the absence of frictional forces during the collision.

neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A ball moving parallel to the y-axis undergoes an elastic collision with a parabolic mirror y^2=2px.Prove that no matter where the prompt of impact lies it will arrive at the mirror's focus.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I believe this can be done in the same way we prove a result for reflection of light in a parabolic mirror.Please guide me if I am wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It can be done the same way. Assuming the mass of ball is negligible compared with the mirror.
 
Ok,thank you.
 
Sorry,I need to talk more.In that equiavalent optics problem,we used Fermat's law of least path.Here it is not available.So,how should we proceed?
 
The 'least path' law still basically applies in the form of a least action principle. But what you really need is just angle of incidence equals angle of reflection. To see this you have to assume there are no frictional forces involved in the collision. This means the wall can only exert a normal force. So the parallel component of the momentum can't change. Conservation of energy now tells you that the normal component of the momentum must just reverse.
 
That's right.But I cannot see anything using only "law" of reflection.How does it mean that the reflected ball passes through focus(P)?One possibility is that the undeviated ball strikes the directrics and from the definition of parabola,e=1...so,SP=SN.That is (d/dt)SN=(d/dt)SPThis means magnitude of velocity remains unchanged iff the ball reflects along SP...Because,for other points the relation is not true.

I understand the way is hanging around this.But,I cannot develop logically...
by the way,I hope in the same way one can prove for two focii in an ellipse?
 
This can be done by calculating the "slope of the tangent line" to the curve of the mirror (i.e. the derivative).

However, I have a problem with the statement. You give the equation of the parabolic mirror as y2= 2px, a parabola "opening" to the right but say the ball is coming "parallel to the y-axis", vertically. The ball is going to hit the back of the mirror and will bounce AWAY from the focus!
 
Magnitude of velocity is always unchanged. You have to look at the angles.
 
HallsofIvy,you are right.Actually,I posted the question directly from a book...When I tried,I started with a the geometrical optics analogy in another...so,I overlooked it.

However,how does the differentiation help?
dy/dx=(2p)^(1/2)*(-1/2)[1/{(x)^(1/2)}]

dick,I could not get anything out of ONLY ANGLES.What about the way suggested?
 
  • #10
I think I got a way.I have to show GEOMETRICALLY the reflected ray passes through (p/2,0)
 
  • #11
*First you find the co-ordinates of the point of incidence.
*differentiate y^2 and 2px and equate them and find the slope of the normal in terms of co-ordinates of the point of incidence.
*Now you have incident slope 0,normal's slope known,and reflected ray's slope m,say.
*use standard co-ordinate formula that i=r.This gives the value of m.
*The reflected ray's equation can be found.and it is seen that the line passes through (p/2,0)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K