Proof for a sum to be less than an integral of the sums expression.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the sum \(\sum_{x=2}^n \frac{1}{x^2}\) is less than the integral \(\int_1^n \frac{1}{x^2} dx\). The participants clarify that the lower limit of the integral should be 1, not 0, due to divergence issues. They establish that \(\frac{\pi^2}{6} - 1 < 1\), confirming the inequality holds as \(n\) approaches infinity. A graphical approach using Riemann sums is suggested as a simpler method to visualize the relationship between the sum and the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann sums and their application in calculus.
  • Familiarity with improper integrals and convergence criteria.
  • Knowledge of the Basel problem and the sum of inverse squares, specifically \(\frac{\pi^2}{6}\).
  • Basic graphing skills to visualize functions and areas under curves.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Riemann sums and their role in approximating integrals.
  • Learn about improper integrals and conditions for convergence.
  • Explore the Basel problem and its implications in series convergence.
  • Practice graphing functions like \(f(x) = \frac{1}{x^2}\) to understand area calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, educators, and anyone interested in the relationship between series and integrals, particularly in the context of convergence and approximation techniques.

Gregg
Messages
452
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that

\displaystyle\sum_{x=2}^n \frac{1}{x^2}&lt;\int_0^n \frac{1}{x^2} dx

Homework Equations



I'm not sure what equations are relevant for this, but I think for this I would need:

\displaystyle\sum_{x}^{\infty} \frac{1}{x^s} = \displaystyle\prod_{p}^{\infty} \frac{1}{1-p^{-s}}

Or maybe

\displaystyle\sum_{x}^{\infty} \frac{1}{x^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{6}

The Attempt at a Solution



(1)

\displaystyle\sum_{x=2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{x^2} = \displaystyle\sum_{x}^{\infty} \frac{1}{x^2} - 1

\displaystyle\sum_{x=2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{x^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{6} - 1

(2)

\int_0^\infty \frac{1}{x^2} dx = \left[ -\frac{1}{x} \right]_0^\infty

\left[ -\frac{1}{x} \right]_0^\infty = 0 ?

This integral does not converge between those limits?

(3)

\frac{\pi^2}{6} - 1 &gt; 0

So it seems that I can't prove for this? Am I right in using infinity for the limits to prove for n or do I need another method? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a much easier approach. Show a lower Riemann sum for the integral that equals the series. Are you sure you want the lower limit on the integral to be 0? That's divergent, you know. I'm guessing it should be 1.
 
Dick said:
There's a much easier approach. Show a lower Riemann sum for the integral that equals the series. Are you sure you want the lower limit on the integral to be 0? That's divergent, you know. I'm guessing it should be 1.

Yes it was an error the lower limit is not 0 it is 1.

(1)

\displaystyle\sum_{x=2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{x^2} = \displaystyle\sum_{x}^{\infty} \frac{1}{x^2} - 1

\displaystyle\sum_{x=2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{x^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{6} - 1

(2)

\int_1^\infty \frac{1}{x^2} dx = \left[ -\frac{1}{x} \right]_1^\infty

\left[ -\frac{1}{x} \right]_1^\infty = -\frac{1}{\infty} + 1 = 1 ?


(3)

\frac{\pi^2}{6} - 1 &lt; 1

It is proved for infinity now I think but is this enough to say that it is so for

\displaystyle\sum_{x=2}^n \frac{1}{x^2} &lt; \int_1^n \frac{1}{x^2} dx ?
 
Yes, the integral is 1 and pi^2/6-1 is less than one. That's fine. But what I'm suggesting is a more low tech solution in which you don't need to know that the sum of the inverse squares is pi/6. Draw the graph of 1/x^2 and fit rectangles under the curve between every pair of integers. The sum of all the rectangles is clearly less than the integral, right?
 
Dick said:
Yes, the integral is 1 and pi^2/6-1 is less than one. That's fine. But what I'm suggesting is a more low tech solution in which you don't need to know that the sum of the inverse squares is pi/6. Draw the graph of 1/x^2 and fit rectangles under the curve between every pair of integers. The sum of all the rectangles is clearly less than the integral, right?

Oh... I've just realized that the rectangles you're talking about actually fit that sum in the question!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K