Proof for inequality involving absolutes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Undirrast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving the inequality |y-5| ≥ 2, where y is defined as y=(x^2+4x-17)/(2(x-3)). The discussion centers around understanding the behavior of the function and its implications for the inequality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of substituting values into the inequality and question how to determine the range of y-5. There are attempts to factor and analyze the expression, with some participants suggesting specific values to test.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering guidance on how to approach the problem, including factoring and considering cases for the inequality. There is recognition of the need to analyze the behavior of the function as x approaches certain values.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the behavior of the function around critical points, such as x=3, and the implications of the quadratic nature of the expressions involved. There is also mention of homework constraints that limit the ability to provide direct answers.

Undirrast
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If x is real and y=\frac{x^2+4x-17}{2(x-3)}, show that |y-5| \geq 2

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Sorry... Absolutely no idea. I tried to substitute y into the left side to prove that -2 \leq y - 5 \leq 2 but I can't. Anything I should know to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
-2 <= y - 5 <= 2 would be if |y-5|<=2, which isn't the case! you got it backwards.
 
Oops... But I still can't prove it. Can't determine the range of y - 5 at all...
 
plug in -2 - √21 or -2 + √21

What do you get? How do you think i got those numbers? Ask yourself where is y positive? Negative? As x gets really really positive or negative what will happen to this graph? What are the possible points where y could be the smallest it could possibly be?
 
Last edited:
Into what? x or y? I don't get it, why should I do so?
 
into x

This problem might all around be easier for you if you express 5 as (10x-30)/2(x-3)
 
Last edited:
I got this y - 5 = \frac{(x-3)^2 - 11}{2(x-3)}, which doesn't give any minimum value when x = 3, but by splitting it up I get \frac{x-3}{2} - \frac{11}{2(x-3)}, is that what I'm supposed to do? I still don't get the 2 values you got...
 
turn 5 into (10x-30)/2(x-3) so you can add it to your fraction (you need like denominators). Then factor the numerator using the quadratic formula. You'll get different values than me because i didn't bother with the 5, but i suspect it will be easier for you to see if you do.
 
It's \frac{x^2 - 6x - 13}{2(x-3)} right? Hopefully I did not calculate wrongly. If I solve x^2-6x-13=0, I'll get 3 - \sqrt{22} and 3 + \sqrt{22}. Putting them into x makes it zero, that's not what I want to prove?
 
  • #10
Okay no more similar problems we'll just cut to the chase since I think I’m only confusing you. I’m not allowed to give the answer so I’ll try to walk you through step by step.

|(x^2 +4x -17)/2(x-3) – 5| ≥ 2 means we will have to deal with two cases
(x^2 +4x -17)/2(x-3) – 5 ≥ 2 if AND -[(x^2 +4x -17)/2(x-3) – 5] ≥ 2 Right?
Let’s deal with (x^2 +4x -17)/2(x-3) – 5 ≥ 2 first,

(x^2 +4x -17)/2(x-3) – 5 ≥ 2 ⇒ (x^2 +4x -17)/2(x-3) – 7 ≥0
do what you did on that other problem, add the -7 to (x^2 +4x -17)/2(x-3) by making like denominators then factor the numerator
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Okay, I factorized and I got (x-5)^2(x-3) \geq 0, since (x-5)^2 is always positive, so I guess that leaves me to x > 3. What does this means basically?
 
  • #12
where could this overall equation of (x-5)2/2(x-3) change from negative to positive or vice versa?
 
  • #13
You mean when it's \frac{x^2-10x+25}{2(x-3)}? When x = 5 it's zero... x < 5 is negative and x > 5 is positive...
 
  • #14
we simplified (x^2 +4x -17)/2(x-3) – 7 ≥0

to (x-5)^2/2(x-3) ≥0 correct?

so where could switch from positive to negative?

Think of it in terms of numbers if you're confused. if we have 2 numbers: a and b when is a*a/2b negative? when is it positive?

Clearly it's when negative b is negative – do you see how this applies to this problem?
 
  • #15
Sorry... I still don't see how it applies to the problem. So when x < 3 it's negative and x > 3 it's positive, then? How does this relate to the problem at all?
 
  • #16
where is (x^2 +4x -17)/2(x-3) – 5 > 0. FYI when you did the math on this last time your -13 should be +13

Remember our goal is to prove:
|(x^2 +4x -17)/2(x-3) – 5| ≥ 2 if (x^2 +4x -17)/2(x-3) – 5 > 0



This might clear it up, let a = (x^2 +4x -17)/2(x-3) – 5.

What we're trying to do is show if a>0 then a>2
then we will show if a<0 then a>2. which will mean |a| > 2
 
Last edited:
  • #17
Oh, okay, so how do we prove that y - 5 > 0?
 
  • #18
We're almost half way there (don't worry the other half is the exact same process). Answer where is (x^2 +4x -17)/2(x-3) – 5 > 0. FYI when you did the math on this last time your -13 should be +13. So it's where is (x^2 - 6x + 13)/2(x-3) >0

I added this to my last post, you may have missed it, it should explain what we're trying to do:

let a = (x^2 +4x -17)/2(x-3) – 5.

What we're trying to do is show if a>0 then a>2
then we will show if a<0 then a>2. which will mean |a| > 2
 
  • #19
Yea, I got the +13, so factorize it and it's \frac{(x-3)^2+4}{2(x-3)}, so it's negative when x < 3, which is unsuitable?
 
  • #20
Great! so we know if (x^2 +4x -17)/2(x-3) – 5 > 0 then (x^2 +4x -17)/2(x-3) – 5 > 2. That's half of the inequality! How do you think we should we get the other half.

EDIT: you're not fully factoring the top, you don't want two terms if you want to find zeros. x^2 - 6x + 13 has no real roots, so it doesn't equal zero for any real x. But you're right it's negative when x<3
 
  • #21
Well, (x-3)^2 is definitely positive and +4 that's no doubt positive as well, doesn't seem to matter me :P

I kinda get it, but I guess it's necessary for me to explain so much text in the working as well?
 
  • #22
You could break it down into two cases, and have almost no text.

the case of (x^2 +4x -17)/2(x-3) – 5 < 0 implies -((x^2 +4x -17)/2((x-3) – 5) > 2

and the case of (x^2 +4x -17)/2(x-3) – 5 > 0 implies (x^2 +4x -17)/2((x-3) – 5 > 2 (we just did this one)



BTW: You're right on how you dealt with (x-3)^2 + 4, I'm just half asleep at this point. I excpected you to look at the discriminate, and didn't think when I saw you didn't.
 
  • #23
Thanks a lot for your tips, and your patience as well :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K