Proof of 1+1=2: Maths Explanation & Examples

  • Thread starter Thread starter nebbione
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the proof of the arithmetic statement 1+1=2, referencing the extensive treatment found in "Principia Mathematica." It highlights that while formal proofs exist, they rely on foundational axioms that are accepted without proof, such as the properties of addition and multiplication. Participants note that defining basic operations like addition is essential before proving statements like 1+1=2. The conversation also touches on the philosophical implications of mathematical definitions and axioms. Ultimately, understanding these concepts requires a foundational knowledge of mathematics and logic.
nebbione
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
Proof of 1+1=2 ?

Hi everyone! Which is the proof of the rightness of arithmetical operations ?
For example which is the proof that 1+1=2 ??
Can you link me the proof or explain how it is done or where i have to start ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Ahhh ok ok ! But there isn't a simpler proof ? and who can proof that 1*1 = 1 ?? why it is like that ? which is the proof ?
 


There aren't any proofs if you keep on asking "why?", at some point or another you're going to have to accept things as true, without proof: these are axioms. Some common axioms for arithmetic are:

1) a + (b + c) = (a + b) + c
2) a + b = b + a
3) a + 0 = a
4) a + (-a) = 0
5) a*b = b*a
6) a*(b*c) = (a*b)*c
7) 1*a = a
8) a*(1/a) = 1
9) a*(b+c) = a*b + a*c

There are more formal definitions using set theory. Anyway, the idea is to make the axioms as simple as self-evidently true as possible, and then derive everything else from them.

Also, have you heard of the parallel postulate and non-Euclidean geometry? That's quite interesting.

EDIT: Although, re-reading your post, you may have meant something different with your first question. You could think of 2 as being defined as the answer to 1 + 1.
 


As the previous poster said, at some point, there are no proofs. Before we can prove 1+1=2, we have to define what addition of two real numbers. And we define that ... how? We just take it as something that "is." Real numbers prove difficult to define, but it turns out that once we have sets defined (sets may be what we have to take for granted,) it's possible to define real numbers. This is part of why some people think we invented mathematics, but that's a thread in the Philosophy forum.
 


OK nice argument! I understand now! Doing some study in linear algebra i remember about neutral element in multiplication (that is 1) and neutral element in addition (that is 0)
so i can proof that 1*1 is equal to 1 by this axioms right ?
Now it's clear
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
773
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
8K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K