Why is 1 not equal to 0 in this proof?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mark2142
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eqautions Precalculus
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
66 replies · 8K views
mark2142 said:
(And somebody said it’s proving 1=0 by assuming 1=0. I didn’t get that.)
##25\dfrac{m}{s}## is a quantity of ##25## meter per second. It says what happens within the timespan of one second, namely a change in location of ##25## meter. It normalizes time. One second becomes the unit, i.e. ##1## second = ##1##.

By writing ##\dfrac{x}{x-1}## you introduced the unit ##x-1## which thus is treated like ##1## wheras it still equals ##x-1=1-1=0.## In this sense, you treated ##1## as ##0##. You made ##1## second ##0## seconds.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
jbriggs444 said:
This is a new predicate that we can get from the previous one by squaring both sides
You mean multiplying by ##x## on both side.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
This divide by 0 was a joke / trick we used to play on the younger kids at school when I was a teenager. And that was a long time ago! We used to set them up with the basics and say look, this proves 1 = 0 and watch as they approached the maths teacher for help.

Why are we still discussing this in a TWO page thread?! Dividing by zero is just not allowed. End of.

And remind yourself of when it was posted here...
 
  • Like
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and fresh_42
PS people my age may remember that The Who released a single in 1971 called "wont get ****** again" :wink:
 
DrJohn said:
This divide by 0 was a joke / trick we used to play on the younger kids at school when I was a teenager. And that was a long time ago! We used to set them up with the basics and say look, this proves 1 = 0 and watch as they approached the maths teacher for help.

Why are we still discussing this in a TWO page thread?! Dividing by zero is just not allowed. End of.

And remind yourself of when it was posted here...
No. This is exactly why math in school does not work. Instead of providing any insights, it's simply forbidden. This is not how education works, at least not on PF. Why is it forbidden? You only offer: "because it is". Truth is, the why question can be answered on many levels, and we did not even touch all of them!

Shut up and calculate might work in quantum physics, but it does not work in mathematics. Not even at school, as can be seen at any school of your choice.
 
  • Like
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: SammyS and PeroK
fresh_42 said:
No. This is exactly why math in school does not work. Instead of providing any insights, it's simply forbidden.
When I was at school I could see for myself that division by zero was problematic. I don't see any deficiency in my reasoning in those days that required advanced abstract mathematics. I certainly wasn't guilty of "shut up and calculate". Quite the opposite!
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42