MHB Proof of an Infimum Being Equal to the Negative Form of a Supremum ()

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the relationship between the infimum of a set of real numbers and the supremum of its negated set. Specifically, it establishes that for a nonempty set of real numbers \( A \) that is bounded below, the equality \( \inf A = -\sup(-A) \) holds true. The proof involves demonstrating that if \( -\alpha \) is an upper bound for the negated set \( -A \), then for any number \( t < -\alpha \), there exists an element \( x \in A \) such that \( t < -x \le -\alpha \), confirming that \( -\alpha = \sup(-A) \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real analysis concepts such as infimum and supremum.
  • Familiarity with set notation and operations, particularly negation of sets.
  • Knowledge of inequalities and their implications in mathematical proofs.
  • Basic proficiency in constructing mathematical proofs.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of infimum and supremum in real analysis.
  • Explore examples of bounded and unbounded sets in real numbers.
  • Learn about the completeness property of the real numbers.
  • Practice constructing proofs involving inequalities and bounds.
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying real analysis, as well as educators and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of limits and bounds in mathematical sets.

AutGuy98
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I'm kind of in a rush because I'll have to go to my classes soon here at USF Tampa, but I had one last problem for Intermediate Analysis that needs assistance. Thank you in advance to anyone providing it.

Question being asked: "Let $A$ be a nonempty set of real numbers which is bounded below. Let $-A$ be the set of all numbers $-x$, where $x$ is an element of $A$. Prove that $\inf A=-\sup(-A)$."

This is what I had so far for a proof: "Let $\alpha =\inf A$. For any $x\in A$, $\alpha \le x$. This implies that $-\alpha \ge -x$ for all $-x\in -A$. This means $-\alpha$ is an upper bound of $-A$. Also, if $-\gamma <-\alpha$ then $-\gamma$ cannot be an upper bound of $-A$ because if it is, then $-\gamma \ge -x$ for all $-x \in -A$. This implies that $\gamma >\alpha$ and that $\gamma$ is a lower bound of $A$, which is not possible since $\alpha = \inf A$."

Please help me out here, since this is the last problem I need help with at this point in time and I would really, really appreciate it. Thanks again in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, AutGuy98!

You've correctly shown that $-\alpha$ is an upper bound for $-A$. To show that $-\alpha = \sup(-A)$, show that for every $t < -\alpha$, there exists $x\in A$ such that $t < -x \le -\alpha$. Indeed, this will show that no number less than $-\alpha$ is an upper bound for $-A$, allowing you to conclude that $-\alpha = \sup(-A)$.

Let $t < -\alpha$. Then $-t > \alpha$; since $\alpha = \inf(A)$, there exists $x\in A$ such that $-t > x \ge \alpha$. Thus $t < -x \le -\alpha$.
 
Euge said:
Hi, AutGuy98!

You've correctly shown that $-\alpha$ is an upper bound for $-A$. To show that $-\alpha = \sup(-A)$, show that for every $t < -\alpha$, there exists $x\in A$ such that $t < -x \le -\alpha$. Indeed, this will show that no number less than $-\alpha$ is an upper bound for $-A$, allowing you to conclude that $-\alpha = \sup(-A)$.

Let $t < -\alpha$. Then $-t > \alpha$; since $\alpha = \inf(A)$, there exists $x\in A$ such that $-t > x \ge \alpha$. Thus $t < -x \le -\alpha$.

Thank you so much Euge. This helped me out tremendously and my gratitude cannot be expressed in words, although I try my best. Thank you again.
 
As shown by this animation, the fibers of the Hopf fibration of the 3-sphere are circles (click on a point on the sphere to visualize the associated fiber). As far as I understand, they never intersect and their union is the 3-sphere itself. I'd be sure whether the circles in the animation are given by stereographic projection of the 3-sphere from a point, say the "equivalent" of the ##S^2## north-pole. Assuming the viewpoint of 3-sphere defined by its embedding in ##\mathbb C^2## as...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
896
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K