Proof of Baker-Hausdorff Lemma - Find Online for Quantum Mechanics

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter the_kid
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the search for an elementary proof of the Baker-Hausdorff Lemma as presented in Sakurai's "Quantum Mechanics" on page 95 (equation 2.3.47). Participants highlight the difficulty in finding such a proof that does not involve Lie algebras. A suggestion is made to refer to problems 3.3 and 3.4 in "Quantum Mechanics" by Ballentine, which are solved in appendix D and may provide a foundational understanding of the lemma without delving into topological complexities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles as outlined in Sakurai's textbook.
  • Familiarity with the Baker-Hausdorff Lemma and its applications.
  • Basic knowledge of problem-solving techniques in quantum mechanics.
  • Awareness of the structure and content of "Quantum Mechanics" by Ballentine.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Baker-Hausdorff Lemma in detail, focusing on elementary proofs.
  • Study problems 3.3 and 3.4 in "Quantum Mechanics" by Ballentine for insights into the lemma.
  • Explore alternative quantum mechanics textbooks that may provide different proofs or explanations.
  • Investigate online academic resources or forums dedicated to quantum mechanics for additional discussions on the lemma.
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists seeking a deeper understanding of the Baker-Hausdorff Lemma, and educators looking for teaching resources related to quantum theory.

the_kid
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
I'm studying QM out of Sakurai's book and on page 95 (equation 2.3.47), he states the Baker-Hausdorff Lemma without proof. I've scoured the internet in search of an elementary proof (i.e. one that does not rely on lie algebras, etc.), but have come up empty. I was wondering if anyone knew of a place I could find a proof online.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check out problems 3.3 & 3.4 in the text on Quantum Mechanics by Ballentine. They are solved in the appendix D. It should be a start to the general formula, indeed without involving topological issues.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K