Proof of f(x) = g(x) for all x in R

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving that if two continuous functions f and g defined on R satisfy the condition that every interval (a, b) contains a point y where f(y) = g(y), then f(x) = g(x) for all x in R. The proof utilizes the Intermediate Value Theorem (IVT) and the concept of nested intervals to construct a sequence of points c_n converging to any chosen point x. By demonstrating that the limits of f(c_n) and g(c_n) converge to f(x) and g(x) respectively, the conclusion follows that f(x) = g(x) due to the continuity of both functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuous functions on R
  • Familiarity with the Intermediate Value Theorem (IVT)
  • Knowledge of nested intervals and convergence
  • Basic concepts of limits and epsilon-delta definitions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Intermediate Value Theorem (IVT) in detail
  • Explore the properties of continuous functions and their implications
  • Learn about nested intervals and their convergence properties
  • Investigate the Squeeze Lemma (Sandwich Lemma) and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying real analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of continuous functions and proofs involving limits and convergence.

C.E
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
1. Suppose that f and g are continuous functions defined on R and every interval
(a, b) contains some point y with f(y) = g(y). Show that f(x) = g(x) for every x in R.


3. I can show that between any two points in are there is some x such that f(x)=g(x). Is that enough? I don't think it is but have no idea what else I can do. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let x be any point in R and consider the sequence of nested intervals I_n:= ]x-1/n,x+1/n[ "converging" to {x}. Try to use the hypothesis that every interval (a, b) contains some point y with f(y) = g(y) to find a sequence {x_n} with x_n in I_n such that f(x_n)=g(x_n) and x_n-->x. How does this imply the desired conclusion?
 
The thing you show is not enough - it is just a restatement of the hypothesis. You've not used the fact that f and g are continuous - that should concern you.

You want to show that for any x f(x)=g(x).

So, take an x. What do we have? Results about intervals. What might your first step be here?
 
How is this? Is this now a full proof?

Select any x then by IVT for any natural n \existsc_n in (x,x+1/n) such that<br /> g(c_n)=f(c_n). we construct a sequence of such c_n values. Clearly the limit of c_n as n goes to infinity is x also the limit of f(c_n)= the limit of g(c_n). Hence by continuity g(x)=f(x).
 
Yes, this is good. Except, that sure it is clear that c_n-->x, but can you give a rigorous argument?And also, why do you say "By IVT"?!?
 
To show c_n --> x could we just set epsilon=1/n? I don't know why I said by IVT.
 
That doesn't really make sense... to show that c_n-->x, you need to find, to every epsilon>0, an N>0 such that n>N ==> |c_n-x|<epsilon.

Yes, it suffices to find N for epsilon=1/m for all m>0 (by the archimedean property of R) but what is N for epsilon=1/m?

To prove that c_n-->x rigorously, you can either answer that question or use an argument involving the squeeze lemma (aka sandwich lemma)
 
How is this?

For a given episilon take N= 1 + the integer part of 1/epsilon.
 
Yup.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K