Using the conventions of these notes (not mine).(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

For a flat FRW perturbed universe, the metric is can be written in general as:

[tex]ds^2=a^2(\tau)[(1+2A)dt^2-B_idtdx^i-(\delta_{ij}+h_{ij})dx^idx^j][/tex]

I understand intuitively that we can decompose B_{i}into two parts:

[tex]B_i=B_i^{\perp}+B_i^{\parallel}[/tex]

with

[tex]\nabla \cdot B^{\perp}=\nabla \times B^{\parallel}=0[/tex]

In Fourier space, this means that we decompose the vector into two parts: one parallel to the wavevector k, and one perpendicular.

(And of course, we can write a curl-less vector as a gradient of a scalar.)

He then writes down a similar decomposition for the tensor h_{ij}(eq. 4.2.35-4.2.37). What's the reason/justification for the form of that?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Proof of/Reason for SVT Decomposition

Loading...

Similar Threads - Proof Reason Decomposition | Date |
---|---|

B Reason for Galaxy Fading? | May 2, 2016 |

Looking for other proof of expanding universe. | Oct 15, 2012 |

What proof? | Jul 25, 2012 |

What proof do we have that TIME exists? | Mar 15, 2012 |

Proof of Red Shift that indicates Expansion | Oct 8, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**