MHB Proof Quest: Non-Equilateral Triangle Enclosing Point Z

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving a mathematical inequality involving a non-equilateral triangle and a point Z inside it. The key points include the relationship between the heights of the triangle and the perpendicular distances from point Z to the sides of the triangle. Participants suggest using area calculations and properties of harmonic means to establish the required proofs. There is a specific focus on demonstrating that the sum of ratios of these distances to the corresponding heights equals one. The challenge lies in addressing the non-parallel nature of the distances involved due to the triangle's shape.
frusciante
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am struggling with this question, it would be easy enough if the triangle was equilateral but that is not necessarily the case.

Let (ha, hb, hc) be heights in the triangle ABC, and let Z be a point inside the triangle.

Further to this, consider the points P, Q, R on the sides AB, BC and AC, respectively. P, Q, R lie such that ZP is perpendicular to AB, ZQ is perpendicular to BC, and ZR is perpendicular to AC.

Show that ha/ZQ + hb/ZR + hc/ZP >= 9.

So far I have considered;
Area(ABC) = Area(AZC) + Area(AZB) + Area(BZC) = 0,5*(AC*ZR)+0,5*(AB*ZP)+0,5*(BC*ZQ)

But I don't know if that is any useful. Any comments?

Here is a sketched form of the triangle;

View attachment 5798

https://gyazo.com/7742bc1428ac5adf84033dfc2ec29564
 

Attachments

  • frusciante.jpg
    frusciante.jpg
    13.7 KB · Views: 116
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Prove that $$\frac{ZP}{h_c}+\frac{ZQ}{h_a}+\frac{ZR}{h_b}=1$$. Then use the fact that $$(x+y+z)\left(\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}+\frac{1}{z}\right)\ge9$$ (proved with the help of the harmonic mean).
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
Prove that $$\frac{ZP}{h_c}+\frac{ZQ}{h_a}+\frac{ZR}{h_b}=1$$. Then use the fact that $$(x+y+z)\left(\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}+\frac{1}{z}\right)\ge9$$ (proved with the help of the harmonic mean).

Thank you for your response, Evgeny. Indeed that first expression (=1) must hold, but I am having a hard time to prove that $$\frac{ZP}{h_c}+\frac{ZQ}{h_a}+\frac{ZR}{h_b}=1$$ since the two "types" of distances (ZP - h_c etc) aren't parallel given that the triangle is not equilateral. Any idea?
 
frusciante said:
I am having a hard time to prove that $$\frac{ZP}{h_c}+\frac{ZQ}{h_a}+\frac{ZR}{h_b}=1$$ since the two "types" of distances (ZP - h_c etc) aren't parallel given that the triangle is not equilateral. Any idea?
I am not sure what you mean by parallel types of distances. The altitude from $C$ and $ZP$ are parallel since they are both perpendicular to $AB$. I suggest multiplying both $h_c$ and $ZP$ by $AB$ and using your observation about the sum of areas.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K