MHB Proof Quest: Non-Equilateral Triangle Enclosing Point Z

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving a mathematical inequality involving a non-equilateral triangle and a point Z inside it. The key points include the relationship between the heights of the triangle and the perpendicular distances from point Z to the sides of the triangle. Participants suggest using area calculations and properties of harmonic means to establish the required proofs. There is a specific focus on demonstrating that the sum of ratios of these distances to the corresponding heights equals one. The challenge lies in addressing the non-parallel nature of the distances involved due to the triangle's shape.
frusciante
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am struggling with this question, it would be easy enough if the triangle was equilateral but that is not necessarily the case.

Let (ha, hb, hc) be heights in the triangle ABC, and let Z be a point inside the triangle.

Further to this, consider the points P, Q, R on the sides AB, BC and AC, respectively. P, Q, R lie such that ZP is perpendicular to AB, ZQ is perpendicular to BC, and ZR is perpendicular to AC.

Show that ha/ZQ + hb/ZR + hc/ZP >= 9.

So far I have considered;
Area(ABC) = Area(AZC) + Area(AZB) + Area(BZC) = 0,5*(AC*ZR)+0,5*(AB*ZP)+0,5*(BC*ZQ)

But I don't know if that is any useful. Any comments?

Here is a sketched form of the triangle;

View attachment 5798

https://gyazo.com/7742bc1428ac5adf84033dfc2ec29564
 

Attachments

  • frusciante.jpg
    frusciante.jpg
    13.7 KB · Views: 113
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Prove that $$\frac{ZP}{h_c}+\frac{ZQ}{h_a}+\frac{ZR}{h_b}=1$$. Then use the fact that $$(x+y+z)\left(\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}+\frac{1}{z}\right)\ge9$$ (proved with the help of the harmonic mean).
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
Prove that $$\frac{ZP}{h_c}+\frac{ZQ}{h_a}+\frac{ZR}{h_b}=1$$. Then use the fact that $$(x+y+z)\left(\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}+\frac{1}{z}\right)\ge9$$ (proved with the help of the harmonic mean).

Thank you for your response, Evgeny. Indeed that first expression (=1) must hold, but I am having a hard time to prove that $$\frac{ZP}{h_c}+\frac{ZQ}{h_a}+\frac{ZR}{h_b}=1$$ since the two "types" of distances (ZP - h_c etc) aren't parallel given that the triangle is not equilateral. Any idea?
 
frusciante said:
I am having a hard time to prove that $$\frac{ZP}{h_c}+\frac{ZQ}{h_a}+\frac{ZR}{h_b}=1$$ since the two "types" of distances (ZP - h_c etc) aren't parallel given that the triangle is not equilateral. Any idea?
I am not sure what you mean by parallel types of distances. The altitude from $C$ and $ZP$ are parallel since they are both perpendicular to $AB$. I suggest multiplying both $h_c$ and $ZP$ by $AB$ and using your observation about the sum of areas.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...