Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Proof - Substitution, Jacobian, etc.

  1. Jun 22, 2011 #1

    I recently tried to prove following theorem: Let [tex]\phi:B\to\mathbb{R}^2[/tex] be a diffeomorphism (regular, injective mapping). Then


    With following I can't proof this theorem. Look, I start with integral sums


    According to the transformation phi, we have


    We can imagine phi as a polar coordinate system transformation, so I use notation with variables r,t. Then we have using Taylor formula

    [tex]\begin{array}{ll}x_{i+1}-x_{i}&=\phi_x(r(x_{i+1},y_j),t(x_{i+1},y_j))-\phi_x(r(x_{i},y_j),t(x_i,y_j))\\&=\frac{\partial \phi_x}{\partial r}(\xi,\eta)(r(x_{i+1},y_j)-r(x_{i},y_j))+\frac{\partial \phi_x}{\partial r}(\xi,\eta)(t(x_{i+1},y_{j})-t(x_{i},y_j))\\&=\frac{\partial \phi_x}{\partial r}\delta r_{i+1,j}+\frac{\partial \phi_x}{\partial r}\delta t_{i+1,j}\quad(\textrm{short form})\end{array}[/tex]

    In the same way I can derive

    [tex]y_{j+1}-y_j=\frac{\partial \phi_y}{\partial r}\delta r_{i,j+1}+\frac{\partial \phi_y}{\partial r}\delta t_{i,j+1}[/tex]

    If I put this into (*) I get

    [tex]\sum_{i,j=1}^{n}f(\phi(r_{ij},t_{ij}))\left(\frac{\partial \phi_x}{\partial r}\delta r_{i+1,j}+\frac{\partial \phi_x}{\partial r}\delta t_{i+1,j}\right)\left(\frac{\partial \phi_y}{\partial r}\delta r_{i,j+1}+\frac{\partial \phi_y}{\partial r}\delta t_{i,j+1}\right)[/tex]

    But this is different than I expected. I expected it in the form like

    [tex]\sum_{i,j=1}^{n}f(\phi(r_{ij},t_{ij}))\left(\frac{\partial \phi_x}{\partial r}\frac{\partial \phi_y}{\partial t}-\frac{\partial \phi_y}{\partial t}\frac{\partial \phi_x}{\partial r}\right)\delta r\delta t[/tex]

    Do I something wrong? Thanks a lot..
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Discussions: Proof - Substitution, Jacobian, etc.
  1. Proof of the Jacobian (Replies: 3)

  2. Question on Jacobians (Replies: 3)

  3. The Jacobian Matrix. (Replies: 0)