Proof that d/dx is anti-hermitian by integration by parts

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the derivative operator d/dx is anti-Hermitian using integration by parts, within the context of quantum mechanics and wave functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the integration by parts technique and question the behavior of wave functions at infinity and under periodic boundary conditions. There are discussions about the constancy of the product of wave functions and the implications of normalization.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided insights on the limits of integration and the conditions under which certain terms vanish. There is a recognition of the need for clarity regarding the behavior of wave functions at boundaries, but no consensus has been reached on all points raised.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of specific conditions such as normalizability of wave functions and periodic boundary conditions, which influence the discussion but remain under examination.

HotMintea
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
The attempt at a solution

[tex] \begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \ -\ i\int\psi^* \frac{\partial{\psi}}{\partial x}= \\ -i(\psi^*\psi\ - \int\psi \frac{\partial\psi^*}{\partial x})\space\ (?)<br /> \end{split}<br /> \end{equation*}[/tex]

I thought [itex]\psi^*\psi\ = \ constant\neq\ 0.[/itex] However, it vanishes in the correct proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi HotMintea! :smile:

Not sure what this is :redface:, but doesn't [constant]ab = 0 ?
 
As tiny-tim pointed out, you need limits of integration.

However, psi*psi is not a constant. It is only a constant when integrated over all space, but it is not integrated in this case.

The real reason the first term vanishes is that for limits at plus or minus infinity, the wave-function must decay to 0 to be normalizable. For periodic boundary conditions, the two limits are the same point so they must subtract to 0.
 
Hi tiny-tim and Matterwave! :smile:
Matterwave said:
As tiny-tim pointed out, you need limits of integration.

tiny-tim said:
Not sure what this is :redface:, but doesn't [constant]ab = 0 ?

For a decaying wave function, is the following correct?:
[tex] \begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \ -\ i\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi^*\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\ =\\-\ i\ (\psi^*\psi\ |_{-\infty}^{\infty} - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi\frac{\partial \psi^*}{\partial x})\ = \\ i\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\psi\frac{\partial\psi^*}{\partial x}<br /> \end{split}<br /> \end{equation*}[/tex]
Matterwave said:
The real reason the first term vanishes is that for limits at plus or minus infinity, the wave-function must decay to 0 to be normalizable.
Thus, [itex]\psi\ = \ 0 \ at \ x\ = -\infty\ \ and \ \infty[/itex]?
Matterwave said:
For periodic boundary conditions, the two limits are the same point so they must subtract to 0.
For periodic boundary conditions, [itex]\ -\ i\int_{a}^{a} \psi^*\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\ = \ i\int_{a}^{a}\psi\frac{\partial\psi^*}{\partial x}\ = \ 0[/itex] ?
Matterwave said:
However, psi*psi is not a constant. It is only a constant when integrated over all space, but it is not integrated in this case.

For [itex]\psi\ = \ Ae^{i(k x-\omega t)}[/itex] where A is an arbitrary constant, [itex]\psi^* \psi\ = \ A^2 \ = \ constant.[/itex] Is [itex]\psi^* \psi\ = \ constant[/itex] not true in general? (Example taken from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normalizable_wave_function#Example_of_normalization)
 
Last edited:
Hi HotMintea! :smile:
HotMintea said:
Thus, [itex]\psi\ = \ 0 \ at \ x\ = -\infty\ \ and \ \infty[/itex]?

Yes.
For periodic boundary conditions, [itex]\ -\ i\int_{a}^{a} \psi^*\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\ = \ i\int_{a}^{a}\psi\frac{\partial\psi^*}{\partial x}\ = \ 0[/itex] ?

No, [itex]\psi[/itex] is the same (at each boundary), so the [] is zero, not the ∫.
For [itex]\psi\ = \ Ae^{i(k x-\omega t)}[/itex] where A is an arbitrary constant, [itex]\psi^* \psi\ = \ A^2 \ = \ constant.[/itex] Is [itex]\psi^* \psi\ = \ constant[/itex] not true in general?

That's a featureless plane wave, so of course [itex]\psi^* \psi[/itex] is constant.

Not all waves are so uninteresting. :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Not all waves are so uninteresting. :wink:
:wink:!
tiny-tim said:
No, [itex]\psi[/itex] is the same (at each boundary), so the [] is zero, not the ∫.
For the periodic boundary conditions, is the following correct?:
[tex] \begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \ -\ i\int_{a}^{b} \psi^*\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\ = -\ i\ (\psi^*\psi\ |_{a}^{b} - \int_{a}^{b}\psi\frac{\partial\psi^*}{\partial x})\ <br /> \end{split}<br /> \end{equation*}[/tex]
However, [itex]\psi(a)\ = \psi(b).[/itex] Moreover, conjugates [itex]\psi^*(a)\ = \psi^*(b).[/itex] Thus, [itex]\psi^*\psi\ |_{a}^{b}\ = \ 0.[/itex]

Therefore,
[tex]\begin{equation*}\begin{split} -\ i\int_{a}^{b} \psi^*\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\ = \ i\int_{a}^{b}\psi\frac{\partial\psi^*}{\partial x} \end{split}\end{equation*}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Yes! :smile:
 
Thanks for your help! :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
689
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
423
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K