Proof that f maps an infinite set from Real Numbers to Rational Numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter burak100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite Set
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
11 replies · 3K views
burak100
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
infinite set

Homework Statement


[itex]f: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{Q}[/itex],

show that there is a [itex]q \in \mathbb{Q}[/itex] st. [itex]f^{-1}(q)[/itex] is infinite set in [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex].

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



how can we show that is true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Do you know R is uncountable? That would be a clue.
 


infinite set means ; we can't find 1-1 correspondence between the set {1,...,n} and [itex]f^{-1}(q)[/itex] , here [itex]f^{-1}(q)[/itex] has n elements.
So, can we say [itex]f^{-1}(q)[/itex] is uncountable then we can't find 1-1 correspondence between the set {1,...,n}...?
 


burak100 said:
infinite set means ; we can't find 1-1 correspondence between the set {1,...,n} and [itex]f^{-1}(q)[/itex] , here [itex]f^{-1}(q)[/itex] has n elements.
So, can we say [itex]f^{-1}(q)[/itex] is uncountable then we can't find 1-1 correspondence between the set {1,...,n}...?

Try to get the idea of your proof before you start writing symbols. Assume the opposite, that all of the f^(-1)(q) are finite. And you didn't answer my question. Do you know R is uncountable, and do you know what that means?
 


yeah R is uncountable but I can't find a relation to this question..
 


burak100 said:
yeah R is uncountable but I can't find a relation to this question..

Every element if R is in one of the f^(-1)(q) sets, right? Suppose they are all finite?
 


I didn't understand clearly but ;

for all [itex]q \in \mathbb{Q}[/itex], we suppose all the sets, [itex]f^{-1}(q)[/itex] are finite. That means, every element of [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex] is one of these sets, [itex]f^{-1}(q)[/itex] ...right?
 


burak100 said:
I didn't understand clearly but ;

for all [itex]q \in \mathbb{Q}[/itex], we suppose all the sets, [itex]f^{-1}(q)[/itex] are finite. That means, every element of [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex] is one of these sets, [itex]f^{-1}(q)[/itex] ...right?

Every element of R is in one of the f^(-1)(q) whether those sets are finite or not, just because f:R->Q. Pick an element x of R, for which q in Q is x in f^(-1)(q)??
 


Dick said:
Every element of R is in one of the f^(-1)(q) whether those sets are finite or not, just because f:R->Q. Pick an element x of R, for which q in Q is x in f^(-1)(q)??

I think that is right because just now we said
" every element of R is in one of the set f^{-1}(q) "
 


burak100 said:
I think that is right because just now we said
" every element of R is in one of the set f^{-1}(q) "

Yes, but can you tell me why?? Just because we said it doesn't prove it. You are going to need this as part of your proof.
 
Last edited:


Ok. I think; we have [itex]\mathbb{R}= \bigcup\limits_{q \in \mathbb{Q}} f^{-1}(q)[/itex], and we suppose that for all q in Q , [itex]f^{-1}(q)[/itex] finite, then union would be countable but R is uncountable so contradiction... right?
 


burak100 said:
Ok. I think; we have [itex]\mathbb{R}= \bigcup\limits_{q \in \mathbb{Q}} f^{-1}(q)[/itex], and we suppose that for all q in Q , [itex]f^{-1}(q)[/itex] finite, then union would be countable but R is uncountable so contradiction... right?

Right, if you are clear on why the union of all the f^(-1)(q) is R.