Show Cardinality of Real Numbers and Complements

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating the cardinality relationships between the real numbers, a countable set C, and their combinations. The original poster attempts to show that the sets \(\mathbb{R} \setminus C\), \(\mathbb{R}\), and \(\mathbb{R} \cup C\) have the same cardinality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different definitions of functions intended to establish bijections between the sets. Questions arise regarding the definition of C and its implications for the proposed functions. There is also discussion about the nature of the elements in C and how they affect the cardinality arguments.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide clarifications and suggest refinements to the functions defined by the original poster. There is ongoing exploration of the implications of C being countable and how that affects the cardinality comparisons. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being considered, particularly regarding the set difference and the nature of the bijections.

Contextual Notes

It is noted that C is countable, which could mean it is either finite or denumerable. Participants express concern about the definitions and the potential overlap of elements in C with the natural numbers.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


##\mathbb{R} \setminus C \sim \mathbb{R} \sim \mathbb{R} \cup C##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I have to show that all of these have the same cardinality. For ##\mathbb{R} \cup C \sim \mathbb{R}##, if ##C = \{c_1, c_2, ... c_n \}## is finite we can define ##

f(x) =
\begin{cases}
n &~ \text{if} ~x=c_n~ \text{where} ~n \le |C| \\
n+|C| &~ \text{if} ~x=n~ \text{where} ~n \in \mathbb{N} \\
x &~ \text{if} ~x \not\in \mathbb{N} \cup C

\end{cases}

##

And if ##C = \{c_1, c_2, c_3, ... \}## is infinite we can define
##

f(x) =
\begin{cases}
2n &~ \text{if} ~x=c_n~ \text{where} ~n \in \mathbb{N} \\
2n-1 &~ \text{if} ~x=n~ \text{where} ~n \in \mathbb{N} \\
x &~ \text{if} ~x \not\in \mathbb{N} \cup C

\end{cases}

##

I think that these are both bijections.

However, I am a little confused about showing that ##\mathbb{R} \sim \mathbb{R} \setminus C##. Does this imply that all the elements of ##C## are in ##\mathbb{R}##? If this is the case couldn't we just define ##f: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R} \setminus C##, and have a very similar bijection as the first one defined above?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How is C defined? It has to be defined somewhere, don't leave that out.

What exactly are your functions f supposed to be? They look like they map real numbers to real numbers, but if all elements of C are real numbers, then there is a trivial bijection.
 
mfb said:
How is C defined? It has to be defined somewhere, don't leave that out.

What exactly are your functions f supposed to be? They look like they map real numbers to real numbers, but if all elements of C are real numbers, then there is a trivial bijection.
Sorry, I forgot an important piece of information. The only information given on ##C## is that it is countable, so either finite or denumerable.
 
Then I guess C can contain both real numbers (interesting for R\C) and other elements (interesting for R u C).
 
mfb said:
Then I guess C can contain both real numbers (interesting for R\C) and other elements (interesting for R u C).
So is what I have above correct at least for showing that ##\mathbb{R}## and ##\mathbb{R} \cup C## have the same cardinality?
 
See my question above: What is f? You didn't introduce it properly.
 
mfb said:
See my question above: What is f? You didn't introduce it properly.
##f:\mathbb{R} \cup C \rightarrow \mathbb{R}##
 
What happens if c2=3? Then you assign two different values to f(3).
The approach can work, but it needs a bit more refinement.
 
Let ##C' = C \setminus \mathbb{N}##

If ##C' = \{c_1, c_2, ... c_n \}## is finite we can define ##,

f(x) =
\begin{cases}
n &~ \text{if} ~x=c_n~ \text{where} ~n \le |C'| \\
n+|C| &~ \text{if} ~x=n~ \text{where} ~n \in \mathbb{N} \\
x &~ \text{if} ~x \not\in \mathbb{N} \cup C'

\end{cases}

##

And if ##C' = \{c_1, c_2, c_3, ... \}## is infinite we can define
##

f(x) =
\begin{cases}
2n &~ \text{if} ~x=c_n~ \text{where} ~n \in \mathbb{N} \\
2n-1 &~ \text{if} ~x=n~ \text{where} ~n \in \mathbb{N} \\
x &~ \text{if} ~x \not\in \mathbb{N} \cup C'

\end{cases}

##

Does that work?
 
  • #10
That should be fine.
 
  • #11
mfb said:
That should be fine.
How would I do the set difference one? I would use a bijection similar to the ones I used above, but I am concerned with the fact that we are using a set difference. Usually if we have $f: A \cup B \rightarrow A$ and we are trying to show that $A \cup B$ has the same cardinality as $A$, we would take the extra elements of $A \cup B$ and embed them in a denumerable subset of $A$. However, since we are using set difference in this case, if I choose that denumerable subet to be the natural numbers, it seems that there is no reason that C could be that same denumerable set (meaning that the natural numbers is no longer a denumerable set of ##\mathbb{R} \cup C##. So I am not sure how to address this.
 
  • #12
Mr Davis 97 said:
How would I do the set difference one?
You can do it very similarly to the other one. Basically reversing the direction.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K