Proof that the eigenfunctions of a self-adjoint operator form a complete set.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the completeness of the eigenfunctions of self-adjoint operators, particularly in the context of quantum mechanics and Hilbert spaces. Participants seek references for proofs and explore the implications of this completeness in both finite and infinite-dimensional spaces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about the completeness of eigenfunctions, noting it has been outside the scope of their studies.
  • One participant suggests that the completeness of eigenstates of Hermitian operators is a postulate, as referenced in popular texts like Sakurai.
  • Another participant cites the book Mathematical Physics by Hassani, which provides a proof for finite-dimensional spaces and mentions that normal operators have eigenvectors that span the space.
  • A later reply questions the assumptions needed for the completeness to hold in infinite-dimensional spaces, noting that general self-adjoint operators may not have eigenvalues.
  • One participant recommends Mathematics for Physics and Physicists by Appel for a more rigorous treatment of the infinite-dimensional case using a distributional rigged Hilbert space approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the completeness of eigenfunctions for self-adjoint operators, with some viewing it as a postulate while others highlight the need for further clarification regarding infinite-dimensional spaces.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions and definitions needed for completeness in infinite-dimensional spaces, as well as the potential absence of eigenvalues for general self-adjoint operators.

will.c
Messages
374
Reaction score
1
I know this is a common and important fact, so I've been willing to accept it, but this has always been something that has been "outside the scope" of my quantum lectures. Does anyone have reference for a proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
will.c said:
I know this is a common and important fact, so I've been willing to accept it, but this has always been something that has been "outside the scope" of my quantum lectures. Does anyone have reference for a proof?

IMO, this is a postulate. The physical observables (which are often originated from symmetries) are described by the self-adjoint (or Hermitian) operators in the Hilbert space, and the eigenfunctions of the self-adjoint operators span the Hilbert space.

As in the popular text by Sakurai, the completeness of the set of eigenstates of a Hermitian operator is a postulate.

Cheers
 
The excellent book Mathematical Physics by Hassani has a proof of the spectral decomposition theorem for finite-dimensional vector spaces. As a corollary, a normal operator (one that commutes with its adjoint - more general than simply Hermitian) has eigenvectors that span the space.

To be honest, I don't know what additional assumptions/definitions you need for this to hold for infinite-dimensional spaces (if it even can at all). I think general self-adjoint operators on a Hilbert space don't even need to have eigenvalues. I'm not a mathematician though, so this is farther than I can go...
 
If you want to go a bit beyond Hassani (which I like) in terms of mathematical rigour, then look at the book Mathematics for Physics and Physicists by Appel. Chapter 14, Bras, kets, and all that sort of thing, uses a distributional rigged Hilbert space approach to treat the infinite-dimensional case.
 
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K