Proof: The product of any 4 consecutive integers

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the assertion that the product of any four consecutive integers is one less than a perfect square. Participants explore the algebraic representation of this claim and engage in attempts to manipulate the expression for further understanding.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss substituting an integer variable into the product of four consecutive integers and express confusion about how to proceed with polynomial expansion. Some suggest manipulating the polynomial to achieve a form resembling a perfect square minus one. Others explore the possibility of factoring the polynomial and question how to derive a suitable integer representation for k.

Discussion Status

Several participants have shared their attempts at expanding and factoring the polynomial, with some noting the challenges they face in factoring higher-degree polynomials. There is a recognition of different methodologies being employed, and while some participants express confidence in their findings, others continue to seek clarification and guidance.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention constraints related to homework rules that prevent them from providing complete solutions, fostering a collaborative environment focused on exploration and understanding.

Animuo
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The product of any 4 consecutive integers will be one less than a perfect square.


Homework Equations


Well, a perfect square is a number that can be broken down to n*n where n is an integer.
If a number is consecutive to another number that means it is exactly one more than the other.


The Attempt at a Solution


So you substitute n for "any integer" and you get this

(n) (n+1) (n+2) (n+3)

I wasn't sure where to go from here I tried making it into a big polynomial and just got confused. The basic idea is that you want to somehow group these numbers together to get two equivalent parts (contained in parentheses) minus one. I've tried several different ways of doing this but for some reason I can't figure it out... I'll let you guys do the work :), thanks ahead of time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Animuo said:
I'll let you guys do the work :)

Aww shucks :!) But we're not allowed! The big bad boss would strip me of my homework helpers medal if I did that... And then I'd have no way to feed my family! :-p

If f(n)=n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3) is equivalent to the form of k^2-1 where k is some integer, then after expanding:

f(n)=n^4+6n^3+11n^2+6n we want to get it in the form k^2-1 and then test to see if we can find such a k. Let's assume for a second that k exists and it's an integer, how can we manipulate f(n) to get it in such a form? Notice f(n) has no constants, which we'll need.
 
I would add 1 to that "big polynomial" and try to see if I could factor it as a perfect square. Maple will do it for you but I suppose that defeats the point of the problem.
 
Uggh I am literally soo bad at factoring.. which is why I kinda handed the reins over.. anyways by trial and error, and some common-sense I came up with (n^2 + 3n + 1)^2 = k^2, so that proves the four consecutive numbers produce a perfect square minus one. I had a lot of trouble factoring this though, and I think that was biggest problem, high school's becoming a distant memory for me, and the math I'm teaching myself now expects me to be pretty fluent at it.. could someone shoot me a link explaining how to factor larger polynomials, or maybe quickly explain it.. thanks for the help guys, it pushed me in the right direction
 
I will confess that my first thought was "that can't possibly be true" so I started looking for a counter example: 1(2)(3)(4)= 24= 5^2- 1, 2(3)(4)(5)= 120= 11^2- 1, 3(4)(5)(6)= 360= 19^2- 1, 4(5)(6)(7)= 840= 29^2- 1, 5(6)(7)(8)= 1680= 41^2- 1.
Well, gosh, maybe it is true! Further, that list shows that the product of four integers, n(n+1)(n+3)(n+4) is k^2- 1 so that I can associate each n with a corresponding k: 1:5, 2:11, 3:19, 4:29, 5:41. And now I could use Newton's divided difference method to find that k= n^2+ 3n+ 1, at least for those numbers.

But knowing that, I can calculate both (n^2+ 3n+ 1)^2- 1 and n(n+1)(n+3)(n+ 4) and see that they are the same for all n.
 
Animuo said:
Uggh I am literally soo bad at factoring.. which is why I kinda handed the reins over.. anyways by trial and error, and some common-sense I came up with (n^2 + 3n + 1)^2 = k^2, so that proves the four consecutive numbers produce a perfect square minus one. I had a lot of trouble factoring this though, and I think that was biggest problem, high school's becoming a distant memory for me, and the math I'm teaching myself now expects me to be pretty fluent at it.. could someone shoot me a link explaining how to factor larger polynomials, or maybe quickly explain it.. thanks for the help guys, it pushed me in the right direction

I don't recall ever reading much about how to factor higher degree polynomials that aren't some special case. But after knowing the answer from Maple and finding the answer was a trinomial squared (I know, I know) I wondered if using that I could factor$$
n^4 +6n^3 + 11n^2 + 6n + 1$$Looking at the highest and lowest order terms it seemed clear the first and last terms of the trinomial must be ##n^2## and ##1##. Now$$
(n^2 + f(n) + 1)^2 = n^4+2n^2f(n) + 2n^2 +f^2(n) + 2f + 1$$That takes care of the first and last terms and leaves us with$$
2n^2f(n) + 2n^2 +f^2(n) + 2f=6n^3 + 11n^2 + 6n$$ Then by inspection I observed ##f(n) = 3n## gives the first and last terms here and, luckily, the middle two terms give the ##11n^2##. So we get ##(n^2 + 3n + 1)^2##.
 
Animuo said:

Homework Statement


The product of any 4 consecutive integers will be one less than a perfect square.


Homework Equations


Well, a perfect square is a number that can be broken down to n*n where n is an integer.
If a number is consecutive to another number that means it is exactly one more than the other.

The Attempt at a Solution


So you substitute n for "any integer" and you get this

(n) (n+1) (n+2) (n+3)

I wasn't sure where to go from here I tried making it into a big polynomial and just got confused. The basic idea is that you want to somehow group these numbers together to get two equivalent parts (contained in parentheses) minus one. I've tried several different ways of doing this but for some reason I can't figure it out... I'll let you guys do the work :), thanks ahead of time
You can write \displaystyle (n) (n+1) (n+2) (n+3) as

\displaystyle ((n+1)(n+2))\, ((n)(n+3))
\displaystyle= (n^2+3n+2)\, (n^2+3n)

\displaystyle =((n^2+3n+1)+1)\, ((n^2+3n+1)-1)  ... (a sum times a difference which is the difference of squares)

\displaystyle =(n^2+3n+1)^2-1
 
LCKurtz said:
$$
n^4 +6n^3 + 11n^2 + 6n + 1$$Looking at the highest and lowest order terms it seemed clear the first and last terms of the trinomial must be ##n^2## and ##1##.

I went with that idea that n2 and 1 were the first and last terms of the trinomial. Then I wrote it as (n4 + 6n3 + n2) + (n2 + 6n + 1) + 9n2 = n2(n2 + 6n + 1) + (n2 + 6n + 1) + 9n2 so the stuff in parentheses is the same, but a dead end since that 9n2 is all by itself.
So then I first broke up the terms with 6 as 3+3 and brought one of each of them over with the 9 term to see if they could factor nicely:

n4 + 6n3 + 11n2 + 6n + 1

= n4 + 3n3 + n2 + n2 + 3n + 1 + 9n2 + 3n2 + 3n

= n2(n2 + 3n + 1) + (n2 + 3n + 1) + 3n(n2 + 3n + 1) = (n2 + 3n + 1)(n2 + 3n + 1) = (n2 + 3n + 1)2
 
Thanks guys, I already figured out the solution but some of you guys employ some interesting methodology.. I'll give it a look when I have more time and see what I think.
 
  • #10
SammyS said:
You can write \displaystyle (n) (n+1) (n+2) (n+3) as

\displaystyle ((n+1)(n+2))\, ((n)(n+3))
\displaystyle= (n^2+3n+2)\, (n^2+3n)

\displaystyle =((n^2+3n+1)+1)\, ((n^2+3n+1)-1)  ... (a sum times a difference which is the difference of squares)

\displaystyle =(n^2+3n+1)^2-1

Ahh that's neat :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K