Proof x^2 - y^2 = (x + y)(x - y)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Melodia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around proving the mathematical identity x² - y² = (x + y)(x - y) and its implications in the context of limits and continuity. The user seeks clarification on how to apply the epsilon-delta definition of continuity to demonstrate that if |x - y| is less than sigma, then |x² - y²| must be less than epsilon. The conversation highlights that the variables are real numbers, not just natural numbers, and emphasizes the importance of understanding the behavior of the expression as x approaches y. The factorization technique and the properties of absolute values are crucial in manipulating the inequality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the epsilon-delta definition of continuity
  • Familiarity with polynomial factorization, specifically x² - y²
  • Knowledge of real numbers and their properties
  • Basic skills in manipulating inequalities and absolute values
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of continuity in depth
  • Practice polynomial factorization techniques, focusing on differences of squares
  • Explore the properties of absolute values in inequalities
  • Investigate continuity of functions over specified intervals, such as [1, 2]
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on limits and continuity, as well as educators looking to clarify the epsilon-delta approach in proofs.

Melodia
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello thanks for everyone who helped me on the previous implication proof, here's another problem I'm stuck on:
(Prove or disprove)
14PMD.jpg



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I think it has something to do with x^2 - y^2 = (x + y)(x - y), and here's my interpretation of "i)":
For every natural x and positive natural e, there exists one or more positive natural sigma so that if |x - y| is smaller than sigma then |x^2 - y^2| must be smaller than e, which works for any natural y.
But I'm lost at where to go next, since sigma could be any number, and with the absolute sign there won't be negative numbers. The same thing with "ii)" and "iii)", where "ii)" simply switched the ordering of the sets and "iii)" limits x and y to 1 and 2.
Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're not working with the natural numbers, which are {0, 1, 2, 3, ...}. All of the variables are elements of the real numbers, with epsilon and delta being positive reals.

Also, this Greek letter -- [itex]\delta[/itex] -- is lower case delta. This is lower-case sigma -- [itex]\sigma[/itex].

It looks to me like i) and ii) say the exact same thing, which is essentially the statement in terms of delta and epsilon that the function f(x) = x^2 is continuous at an arbitrary real number y. In short, these are saying that if x is close to y (within delta), then x^2 will be close to y^2 (within epsilon).
The third statement limits x and y to the interval [1, 2], but otherwise says the same thing as i) and ii).

The way these work is that you start off with |x^2 - y^2| < epsilon, and work with the left side of the inequality until you get |x - y| < some expression. You can use the factorization - x^2 - y^2 = (x - y)(x + y), and the fact that the absolute value of a product is the product of the absolute values of its factors. The trick is that when you divide by |x + y|, you need to have some idea of how large or small it will be.
 
Thanks! I got it after numerous tests of plugging in numbers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K