MHB Proofing the Equation: (A=B Union C & B ∩ C=Ø) => (A\B=C)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Violet1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Union
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the mathematical statement (A=B union C and B intersect C=Ø) implies (A\B=C). Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the concepts involved, suggesting the use of Venn diagrams to visualize the relationships between sets. One user points out that the original request mislabels the statement as an equation rather than a theorem. The conversation encourages a deeper exploration of formal proof techniques, with a focus on clarity and logical reasoning. Overall, the thread highlights the value of visual aids and precise language in mathematical discussions.
Violet1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi! I need help for this:
Proof equation: (A=B union C and B intersect C=empty set)=>(A\B=C)!

Tnx! :o
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi and welcome to the forum.

What kind of help do you need? Surely you understand that if you take all women from a group of adults, you'll get all men and only men.

Please take some time to read the http://mathhelpboards.com/rules/, especially rule #11. Also, what you are proving is not an equation; it's a statement (claim, proposition, theorem) in the form of an implication. Finally, "proof" is a noun, and the corresponding verb is "prove".
 
Heh :D Perhaps Evengy overdid it a bit.

Okay, try drawing the Venn diagram. What do you observe? Do you see how obvious it is? Can you now sketch out a formal proof?

Balarka
.
 
:(
mathbalarka said:
Heh :D Perhaps Evengy overdid it a bit.

Okay, try drawing the Venn diagram. What do you observe? Do you see how obvious it is? Can you now sketch out a formal proof?

Balarka
.

Thanks Balarka! When I draw Venn diagram, everything is clear! But I can't sketch out a formal proof! :(
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Perhaps you could at least show us what approach you took?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
9K
Back
Top