Propagation of error with sliding window of measurement

  • Thread starter DethLark
  • Start date
  • #1
9
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Hello, I don't seem to know how to ask google this question so I thought I'd see if I could get an answer from here.

Say I have 400 measurements of some variable. I take a sliding window of 50 events and take the standard deviation of each set of 50 events. That would be 350 measurements. Now I want to take the first and second 175 events, take the average of each, and subtract them.

Normally to propagate the error on this final measurement you would, for each side, find the error of each standard deviation std/sqrt(2*(50-1)) then take use sqrt(sum of the squares)/175 to find the error on the average std.dev. for each side. Then use sqrt(sum of the squares) of these two errors for the final error on the subtraction of the averages.

The problem with this is that each measurement of the std.dev shares 49 events with the previous so this method would overestimate the final error. What to do?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
33,821
9,539
Why do you want to compare the floating-average values? Can you compare the original values?

If all values are expected to follow the same distribution, you can calculate the uncertainty for each measurement (out of 400), find a big expression for your final result, and calculate its uncertainty based on the uncertainties of each measurement. I would expect that this formula can be simplified a lot, but I don't know how the final result would look like. In the best case, it does not depend directly on the original 400 values, but just on your 350 values.
 

Related Threads for: Propagation of error with sliding window of measurement

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
45K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Top