Property antisymmetric tensors

  • Thread starter Thread starter phoenixofflames
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Property Tensors
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 3K views
phoenixofflames
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I was wondering how I could prove the following property of 2 antisymmetric tensors [tex]F_{1\mu \nu}[/tex] and [tex]F_{2\mu \nu}[/tex] or at least show that it is correct.

Homework Equations


[tex]\frac{1}{2}\epsilon^{\mu \nu \rho \sigma} F_{1\rho \sigma}F_{2\nu \lambda} + \frac{1}{2}\epsilon^{\mu \nu \rho \sigma} F_{2\rho \sigma}F_{1\nu \lambda} = - \frac{1}{4} \delta^{\mu}_{\lambda} \epsilon^{\rho \sigma \alpha \beta} F_{1 \alpha \beta}F_{2\rho \sigma}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


If \mu = \lambda, the left side gives [tex]- \epsilon^{\rho \sigma \alpha \beta} F_{1 \alpha \beta}F_{2\rho \sigma}[/tex] and the right side also ( summing over \mu )

But how can I see that if \mu is different from \lambda, that this relation is true? The right hand side is zero, but how can I proof that the left side is also zero? I have no idea..
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hunt_mat said:
The indices are incorrectly balanced, there is a [tex]/nu[/tex] on the LHS but none on the RHS

The \nu is contracted, only \mu and \lambda are free indices.