Finding a Minimum Value for a Continuous Function on a Compact Set

  • Thread starter Thread starter trap101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Property
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that for a continuous function f: S → R defined on a compact set S ⊆ ℝn, where f(x) > 0 for all x in S, there exists a constant c > 0 such that f(x) ≥ c for every x in S. Participants reference the Extreme Value Theorem (EVT), confirming that since S is compact, f achieves its minimum and maximum values. The conclusion is that c, defined as f(a) for some a in S, must be positive, as a negative c would contradict the condition f(x) > 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Extreme Value Theorem (EVT)
  • Knowledge of compact sets in ℝn
  • Familiarity with continuous functions and their properties
  • Basic concepts of real analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Extreme Value Theorem in real analysis
  • Explore properties of continuous functions on compact sets
  • Investigate the relationship between compactness and boundedness in ℝn
  • Learn about the definitions and examples of positive functions in mathematical analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone studying properties of continuous functions and compact sets will benefit from this discussion.

trap101
Messages
339
Reaction score
0
Suppose S\subsetℝn is compact, f: S-->R is continous, and f(x)>0 for every x \inS. Show that there is a number c>0 such that f(x) ≥ c for every x\inS.
Attempt:
Since S is contained in Rn is compact, then S is closed and bounded.
By the extreme value thm there exists values a,b that are an absolute minimum and absolute maximum respectively. Let c = f(a). Therefore by EVT f(c) ≤ f(x) in R.Well I have the solution manual and their solution is way different to what I attempted. Is there anything right about this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution is correct. You might want to explain why c>0 however.
 
trap101 said:
Therefore by EVT f(c) ≤ f(x) in R.

Also, this should be c≤f(x).
 
micromass said:
Also, this should be c≤f(x).

But isn't c \in S. SO wouldn't the function map c to f(c)?


micromass said:
Your solution is correct. You might want to explain why c>0 however.


Is the fact c having to be positive because if c < 0 ==> f(a) < f(c) ?
 
trap101 said:
But isn't c \in S. SO wouldn't the function map c to f(c)?

You defined c=f(a). So c is an element of f(S)\subseteq \mathbb{R}. Writing f(c) makes no sense.

Is the fact c having to be positive because if c < 0 ==> f(a) < f(c) ?

Again, f(c) makes no sense.
 
got it now, thanks foe the help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K