Property of independent random variables

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the property of independent random variables, specifically the sum of two independent random variables X and Y, denoted as Z = X + Y. The participants explore the application of the Law of Total Probability to derive the probability mass function for Z, particularly in the context of rolling two dice. The proof involves calculating the probability of Z equaling a specific value z by summing probabilities over valid values of X, constrained by the minimum and maximum possible outcomes of the dice. The final expressions for the probabilities are derived for ranges of z, specifically for 2 ≤ z ≤ 7 and 7 < z ≤ 12.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of independent random variables
  • Familiarity with the Law of Total Probability
  • Basic knowledge of probability mass functions
  • Experience with discrete random variables and their distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the probability mass function for discrete random variables
  • Learn about the Law of Total Probability in greater detail
  • Explore examples of independent random variables in probability theory
  • Investigate the properties of sums of independent random variables
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in statistics, data science, and mathematics who are looking to deepen their understanding of probability theory, particularly in the context of independent random variables and their summation properties.

alfred2
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
hello!

I'm trying to understand the following property:
Let X and Y be independent random variables z: = X + Y. Then
http://imageshack.us/a/img268/9228/71pe.png
where fZ (z) is the probability mass function for a discrete random variable defined as follows:

http://imageshack.us/a/img801/9218/q71.png

and Wx is the set of possible values ​​for the random variable X

Proof: Using the Law of total probability, which is this:
http://imageshack.us/a/img198/8461/qbn.png
we obtain
http://imageshack.us/a/img855/2067/mbd4.png
Question-I don't see how Law of total probability helps us. I even don't understand how we get the first line of the proof-End of Question

Then my book proposes this example: We roll two dices. Let X/Y random variables, which indicate the number of points in the first/second die. We calculate the density of Z: = X + Y:
http://imageshack.us/a/img10/7541/5fx.png
For 2 <= z <= 7 we obtain
http://imageshack.us/a/img17/9047/stvo.png
And 7 <z <= 12:
http://imageshack.us/a/img90/5522/fuz.png
Here I just get that:
http://imageshack.us/a/img593/7442/ok0i.png
But I do not understand why we have this index of summation nor why we put min and max in the next step
Could you help me please? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alfred said:
Then my book proposes this example: We roll two dices. Let X/Y random variables, which indicate the number of points in the first/second die. We calculate the density of Z: = X + Y:
http://imageshack.us/a/img10/7541/5fx.png
For 2 <= z <= 7 we obtain
http://imageshack.us/a/img17/9047/stvo.png
And 7 <z <= 12:
http://imageshack.us/a/img90/5522/fuz.png
Here I just get that:
http://imageshack.us/a/img593/7442/ok0i.png
But I do not understand why we have this index of summation nor why we put min and max in the next step
Could you help me please? Thank you!
The number of spots on the first die is $x$, and on the second die is $y$. You want to know when the sum $x+y$ (the total number of spots on the two dice) is equal to $z$.

If the sum of the spots on the two dice is to be $z$, given that $X=x$, then obviously $x$ must be at least $1$ (because that is the smallest possible value for $x$). But also $x$ must be at least $z-6$ (because $y = z-x$, and $y$ cannot be larger than $6$). Thus we must have $x\geqslant \max\{1,z-6\}$. Next, $x$ cannot be bigger than $6$ (obviously), but also $x$ must not be bigger than $z-1$ (because $y = z-x$, and $y$ cannot be less than $1$). Thus we must have $x\leqslant \min\{6,z-1\}$. Provided both those conditions hold, there will then be a probability of $1/6$ that $y$ will be equal to $z-x$. That is where the expression $$\sum_{x=\max\{1,z-6\}}^{\min\{6,z-1\}}\frac1{36}$$ comes from.

I think that if you follow this example carefully, you will begin to see how the proof in the first part of your post works.
 
alfred said:
Okay, so we have got as far as $$\text{Pr}[Z=z] = \frac16 \sum_{x=\max\{1,z-6\}}^{\min\{6,z-1\}}\text{Pr}[Y= z-x]$$. In that formula, $z$ is fixed. Once we are inside the summation, $x$ is also fixed, because at that stage we are dealing with what happens for a particular value of $x$. So $\text{Pr}[Y= z-x]$ is the probability that $y$ takes the fixed value $z-x$. And of course the probability that $y$ takes any given single value (in the range 1,...,6) is 1/6.

That gives the formula $$\text{Pr}[Z=z] = \sum_{x=\max\{1,z-6\}}^{\min\{6,z-1\}}\frac1{36} $$. Thus each term in the sum is equal to 1/36, and to evaluate the sum we have to multiply 1/36 by the number of terms. If $z$ lies between 2 and 7, then $\max\{1,z-6\} = 1$ and $\min\{6,z-1\} = z-1$. So the sum goes from $x=1$ to $x=z-1$. Hence there are $z-1$ terms in the sum, and since each term is equal to 1/36, the sum is $$\frac{z-1}{36}$$. In a similar way, you should be able to work out that if $z$ lies between 7 and 12 then the number of terms in the sum is $13-z$ and so their sum is $$\frac{13-z}{36}$$.
 
Opalg said:
Okay, so we have got as far as $$\text{Pr}[Z=z] = \frac16 \sum_{x=\max\{1,z-6\}}^{\min\{6,z-1\}}\text{Pr}[Y= z-x]$$. In that formula, $z$ is fixed. Once we are inside the summation, $x$ is also fixed, because at that stage we are dealing with what happens for a particular value of $x$. So $\text{Pr}[Y= z-x]$ is the probability that $y$ takes the fixed value $z-x$. And of course the probability that $y$ takes any given single value (in the range 1,...,6) is 1/6.

That gives the formula $$\text{Pr}[Z=z] = \sum_{x=\max\{1,z-6\}}^{\min\{6,z-1\}}\frac1{36} $$. Thus each term in the sum is equal to 1/36, and to evaluate the sum we have to multiply 1/36 by the number of terms. If $z$ lies between 2 and 7, then $\max\{1,z-6\} = 1$ and $\min\{6,z-1\} = z-1$. So the sum goes from $x=1$ to $x=z-1$. Hence there are $z-1$ terms in the sum, and since each term is equal to 1/36, the sum is $$\frac{z-1}{36}$$. In a similar way, you should be able to work out that if $z$ lies between 7 and 12 then the number of terms in the sum is $13-z$ and so their sum is $$\frac{13-z}{36}$$.

Thank you very much! I understand it with your explanation. =D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K