Is Propulsion Physics Part of Nuclear Physics?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter robbie.kpm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Propulsion
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the classification of propulsion physics, particularly in relation to nuclear physics. Participants explore the principles of propulsion in rocketry and whether nuclear reactions play a role in this field, examining both theoretical concepts and historical projects.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that propulsion physics is primarily rooted in classical Newtonian physics, focusing on the application of force to achieve motion.
  • Others argue that propulsion can involve elements of nuclear physics if nuclear reactions are utilized, although no current rockets employ this technology.
  • A participant mentions the importance of fluid dynamics in understanding propulsion systems like rockets and jet engines.
  • Concerns are raised about the safety of using nuclear detonations for propulsion, with some expressing discomfort with the concept of being accelerated by timed nuclear explosions.
  • Discussion includes the idea of controlled nuclear reactions, such as those tested in nuclear rockets, contrasting with the more hazardous shockwave surfing concept.
  • Participants reference historical projects like NERVA and Project Orion, noting their engineering challenges and the political context that led to their abandonment.
  • Some express skepticism about the feasibility of small fusion reactors for propulsion, highlighting the technological advancements required to make such concepts viable.
  • There is mention of various nuclear propulsion projects and experiments from the past, suggesting a broader exploration of nuclear-powered propulsion options.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether propulsion physics is part of nuclear physics, with multiple competing views presented. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the classification and safety of nuclear propulsion concepts.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of propulsion and nuclear physics, as well as unresolved technical and political factors affecting historical projects.

robbie.kpm
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This is probably the wrong section for this question but what area of physics is propulsion physics. For rockets and stuff. Would that be considered nuclear physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, the physics of propulsion is classical Newtonian physics.
Apply a known force to something and it moves in a predictable way.
Rocketry is a just a specialisation within that.
 
It has elements of nuclear physics if the suggested rocket type uses nuclear reactions. No existing rocket does that, but some concepts do.
The motion of the rocket is purely classical mechanics.
 
mfb said:
It has elements of nuclear physics if the suggested rocket type uses nuclear reactions. No existing rocket does that, but some concepts do.
I have heard of such concepts, but I don't feel safe with the idea of being accelerated by carefully timed nuclear detonations.
 
But you feel comfortable being sustained and nourished by a huge continuous runaway fusion reaction at the center of our solar system? :wink:

BTW, they also have concepts and even successfully tested nuclear rockets that work on a controlled reaction, such as in a power plant.
 
The Sun is not a runaway reaction it's fairly stable and predictable and is 150 million km away - but even then it emits occasional outbursts of matter and radiation which are not predictable, and definitely hazardous to be exposed to.
Having said that though, if a fusion reactor could be be made small enough, and we had a technology that would convert it's output into directional thrust, and the payload could be adequately shielded from neutron bombardment - well it might be runner, but that's a lot of tech which is way beyond our present abilities.

The nuclear rocket concepts I have heard of so far involve something along the lines of detonating several fission bombs in sequence behind the rocket which would then 'surf' along on the shockwaves created. That's what I'm not too keen on the idea of.
 
 
I had not come across that one before but it does sound more realistic than the shockwave surfing concept.
I did a quick search and discovered that a proof of concept NERVA prototype was built, which although it had some engineering hurdles to overcome these were not insurmountable.
It's not too clear from my quick search as to why the project was abandoned.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
The shockwave surfing concept was actually surprisingly well developed, but got axed because of the partial test ban treaty. The NERVA I'm not sure either...some political reasons I guess. In the end, public opinion is that nuclear = bad, and therefore either one has a slim chance of being resurrected anytime soon.
 
  • #11
rootone said:
I had not come across that one before but it does sound more realistic than the shockwave surfing concept.
I did a quick search and discovered that a proof of concept NERVA prototype was built, which although it had some engineering hurdles to overcome these were not insurmountable.
It's not too clear from my quick search as to why the project was abandoned.

I'm not sure which ideas you've come across in the past, but here are several:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Orion_(nuclear_propulsion)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Daedalus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Longshot

There was an interesting experiment back in the 60's I think called Project Pluto to develop a nuclear powered cruise missile. It didn't use nuclear explosions to power it, but it used a nuclear reactor to provide power to a continuously running ramjet engine. Though this isn't what you were talking about earlier, it still would technically fall under the description 'nuclear powered propulsion'. If you look at it from that perspective, it opens up some other options that maybe you hadn't considered:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Prometheus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pluto
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
7K