robbie.kpm
- 2
- 0
This is probably the wrong section for this question but what area of physics is propulsion physics. For rockets and stuff. Would that be considered nuclear physics?
The discussion revolves around the classification of propulsion physics, particularly in relation to nuclear physics. Participants explore the principles of propulsion in rocketry and whether nuclear reactions play a role in this field, examining both theoretical concepts and historical projects.
Participants do not reach a consensus on whether propulsion physics is part of nuclear physics, with multiple competing views presented. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the classification and safety of nuclear propulsion concepts.
Limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of propulsion and nuclear physics, as well as unresolved technical and political factors affecting historical projects.
I have heard of such concepts, but I don't feel safe with the idea of being accelerated by carefully timed nuclear detonations.mfb said:It has elements of nuclear physics if the suggested rocket type uses nuclear reactions. No existing rocket does that, but some concepts do.
rootone said:I had not come across that one before but it does sound more realistic than the shockwave surfing concept.
I did a quick search and discovered that a proof of concept NERVA prototype was built, which although it had some engineering hurdles to overcome these were not insurmountable.
It's not too clear from my quick search as to why the project was abandoned.