Proton Structure: De Broglie Wavelength & Resolution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the De Broglie wavelength and its implications for resolving the structure of protons. The calculated De Broglie wavelength of an electron beam is approximately 0.6 x 10-18 m, which is insufficient to resolve the radius of quarks, estimated to be less than 10-19 m. The conversation highlights the importance of momentum transfer between the electron and proton, rather than total momentum, in understanding proton structure. The participants express confusion regarding the neglect of recoil motion in calculations of momentum transfer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of De Broglie wavelength calculations
  • Familiarity with momentum transfer concepts in particle physics
  • Knowledge of energy-momentum relations in relativistic physics
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics and particle interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of De Broglie wavelength in particle physics
  • Learn about momentum transfer calculations in electron-proton collisions
  • Explore the concept of recoil motion in high-energy physics experiments
  • Investigate the structure of protons and the role of quarks in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in particle interactions and the fundamental structure of matter.

Federica
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
An accelerator produces an electron beam with energy E=20 GeV. The electrons diffused at θ=6° are detected. Neglecting their recoil motion, what is the minimum structure in the proton that can be resolved?
Relevant Equations
De Broglie wavelength, λ=h/p and particle energy in natural units $$E =\sqrt{m^2 + p^2} $$
Hi all. I'd personally consider the De Broglie wavelength λ=h/p, with p being the momentum of the electron beam. I get $$\lambda \simeq 0.6 \times 10^{-18} m $$ and since the radius of a quark is ## \leq 10^{-19} m ##, the proton structure can't be resolved. I'm quite sure there's something wrong with my reasoning, since I didn't use the information on θ.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The relevant momentum is not the total momentum of the electron, but the momentum transfer between electron and proton.

Quarks are probably elementary without a radius, but that's not what you want to resolve to look inside protons: If you see quarks you see a substructure already.
 
mfb said:
The relevant momentum is not the total momentum of the electron, but the momentum transfer between electron and proton.

Quarks are probably elementary without a radius, but that's not what you want to resolve to look inside protons: If you see quarks you see a substructure already.

thank you for your reply. But how can I find the momentum transfer between proton and electron if I have to neglect the recoil motion? I assume this means the energy of the proton is always equal to its mass (if c is equal to 1)
 
Think of the electron momentum before and after the collision.
 
I know how to do this as long as I can consider the recoil motion. Here's my reasoning: I call ##E## and ##E'## the energies of the incoming and outgoing electron respectively, while ##p## and ##p'## are their momenta. ##E_{r}## is the recoil motion, ##m_e## and ##m_p## are the masses of the electron and proton. I have:

$$ (E+m_p)^2 - p^2 = (E' + E_r)^2 - (\overrightarrow{p}' + \overrightarrow{p_r})^2 $$

which gives

$$ EM = E'E_r -p'p_rcos\theta = E'(E + M - E') - pp'cos\theta - p^2 $$

$$ E' = \frac{E}{1+\frac{E}{M}(1-cos\theta)} $$

and by ## E -E' ## I can get the momentum transfer between electron and proton. But since I have to neglect the recoil motion, I get:

$$ (E+M)^2 - p^2 = (M+E')^2 - p'^2 $$

$$E = E'$$

which implies the momentum transfer is equal to zero. What's wrong with my reasoning?
 
If you assume that the proton doesn't get energy (but can get momentum) then the electron has the same energy before and after. From the change in flight direction you can calculate its change in momentum.

As the proton is heavy it won't get much energy from a change in momentum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K