Proton transport problem using MCNP

AI Thread Summary
Proton transport issues in MCNP, particularly regarding electron production during proton interactions, are discussed, with users reporting significant energy loss of protons due to cutoff. The original poster, Antonio, notes that despite modifying physics cards, no secondary particles are generated. A colleague mentions using MCNPX and MCNP6 for similar simulations, while Antonio highlights that MCNP6.1 cannot handle delta-ray production, which is addressed in the upcoming MCNP6.2. Another user, Eva, expresses frustration over a high percentage of protons being lost in her simulations, questioning the validity of her results. The discussion emphasizes the need for updated software capabilities to accurately model proton interactions.
Antonio_A
Messages
3
Reaction score
3
Hello everyone !

I wanted to ask you if anyone ever encountered problems with proton transport using MCNP. In particular, the production of electrons when protons interact with matter. I have been trying to figure it out modifying the different physics cards (phys, lca, ...) with no result. Since a proton is a charged particle, ionization is expected and not even a single secondary particle is created while, in the output file most (if not all) of the incident protons are lost by energy cutoff meaning that they lose energy.
If anyone with experience in proton transport could enlighten me or give me some clues, it would be great.

Thanks,
Antonio
 
  • Like
Likes evjanuclear
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thanks for the thread! What version of MCNP is one using, MCNPX or MCNP6?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From - https://mcnp.lanl.gov/pdf_files/la-ur-13-22934.pdf
it states, "Transport with elastic and inelastic nuclear scattering, Continuous slowing down approximation, energy and angle straggling, magnetic field effects"

There may be some insight in this thesis - Using MCNPX to Calculate Primary and Secondary Dose in Proton Therapy
https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/1853/39499/ryckman_jeffrey_m_201105_mast.pdf

One could search on "MCNP proton slowing down" or "continuous slowing down approximation" with or without MCNP

I have a colleague who has used MCNPX and MCNP6 to simulate the effects of proton beam on targets.
 
  • Like
Likes evjanuclear
Thanks for your replies

Greg Bernhardt said:
What version of MCNP is one using, MCNPX or MCNP6?

MCNP 6

Astronuc said:
There may be some insight in this thesis

I already have looked into it, it describes well how to setup the physics transport of protons in the input file but it treats a completely different case and it is useless in my situation as i described the most complete case for protons.I have found PIXE (particle-induced x-ray emission) cross-section libraries. This is not a PIXE problem but since it treats the ionization as main process and it is also what i am interested in, i taught that i might as well have a look at it. Now, i don't know how to make these libraries work with mcnp and if anyone (you know) has already tried this, i would love to know how you did it.

Thanks,
Antonio
 
  • Like
Likes evjanuclear
I finally have an answer. For those wondering, MCNP6.1 is not able to compute this kind of cases. Delta-ray production from charged particles is implemented in MCNP6.2 which will be available by the end of this month.

Topic can be closed.
 
  • Like
Likes evjanuclear
Hi, I have a similar problem.I'm simulating in MCNP6 the reaction of proton beam on targets but in the simulation the 96% of the proton are lost for energy cutoff.
I don't understand why happen that. I use a tally4 to obtain the reaction in the target, but I suppose the results are wrong because the lost of protons (if they are lost they can´t interact isn´t it?)

Any idea?

Thanks,
Eva
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Back
Top