colinr
- 29
- 0
isn't a neutron more massive thatn a proton?
The discussion centers on the mass comparison between protons and neutrons, establishing that a neutron is approximately 0.2% more massive than a proton, translating to an energy difference of 1.29 MeV. The mass of a proton is precisely 1.67262158 × 10-27 kilograms, while the mass of an electron is 9.10938188 × 10-31 kilograms, indicating that the proton is over 10,000 times more massive than an electron. The conversation also touches on the concept of bonding energy, explaining that when particles bond, the resulting particle may have a lower mass than the sum of its constituents.
PREREQUISITESStudents of physics, researchers in particle physics, and anyone interested in understanding the fundamental properties of subatomic particles.
Atheist said:It is. Free neutrons are even unstable and decay with a lifetime of something like 12min. To my big surprise, when I looked it up, the mass-difference was much more than I expected: 2.5 times the mass of an electron (I expected not much more than the electron mass).
ArmoSkater87 said:This is impossible, the mass of the proton is 1.67262158 × 10-27 kilograms, while the mass of the electron is 9.10938188 × 10-31 kilograms. This means that the proton has a mass more than 10^4 times that of the electron.