Protons: matter or anti-matter?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the classification of protons and electrons as matter or antimatter. Participants debate the conventional definitions, suggesting that protons could be considered antimatter and electrons matter based on their interactions and the observable universe. The conversation highlights the imbalance of matter and antimatter post-Big Bang and explores the implications of defining particles based on their charge and behavior. Key concepts include the role of baryons, anti-baryons, and the standard model of particle physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics terminology, including baryons and anti-baryons.
  • Familiarity with the standard model of particle physics.
  • Knowledge of charge conservation and particle interactions.
  • Basic grasp of quantum electrodynamics (QED) principles.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of baryon asymmetry in the universe.
  • Study the standard model of particle physics in detail.
  • Explore quantum electrodynamics (QED) and its role in particle interactions.
  • Investigate alternative theories regarding matter-antimatter classification.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of particle physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental questions surrounding matter and antimatter in the universe.

  • #31
Drakkith said:
Please understand that posts on PF are about mainstream science, not about what MIGHT be. We use the definitions and rules that science has given us and are accepted by the vast majority of people. We CANNOT simply start changing what things are called and what they mean whenever we want, otherwise what's the point of agreeing on a definition in the first place?

Of course. The Sun is revolving around the Earth.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Epaminondas said:
Of course. The Sun is revolving around the Earth.

:cry:
 
  • #33
Drakkith said:
Please understand that posts on PF are about mainstream science, not about what MIGHT be. We use the definitions and rules that science has given us and are accepted by the vast majority of people. We CANNOT simply start changing what things are called and what they mean whenever we want, otherwise what's the point of agreeing on a definition in the first place?

Drakkith, I guess you are right. I've read the forum rules carefully, and see that there is a special section for the non-mainstream physics discussions. I find it very interesting. Thank you!
 
  • #34
Which brings this thread to a close.
 

Similar threads

High School Can a hypothetical atom be made out of positrons and electrons ?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
High School What does QFT really predict about matter/anti-matter interactions?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Undergrad Anti Proton - Non Proton reaction
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Undergrad Antimatter atoms vs atoms with greater mass?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
High School What are the differences between relict and relic?
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
Undergrad Can a particle transform into its counter anti-particle?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Undergrad Can proton/neutron decay be avoided in some conditions?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Graduate Matter - anti matter annihilation
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Undergrad Do Quark Stars Contain Hexaquarks and How Do They Affect Proton Decay?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Undergrad Probing into protons with high-energy particles
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K