Prove Bloch's Theorem from Integral Schrodinger's Eqn

  • Thread starter Thread starter king vitamin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving Bloch's Theorem using the integral form of the Schrödinger equation, specifically addressing the case where the scattering potential exhibits translation invariance, denoted as V(\mathbf{r} + \mathbf{R}) = V(\mathbf{r}). The key equation derived is the relation for scattering solutions, \psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}+\mathbf{R}) = e^{i \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{R}}\psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}). The integral form of the Schrödinger equation is utilized, and the discussion highlights the challenges in manipulating the wave functions and Green's functions to demonstrate the theorem effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral form of Schrödinger's equation
  • Familiarity with Bloch's Theorem and its implications in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of translation invariance in potential functions
  • Proficiency in mathematical techniques such as variable substitution and integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Bloch's Theorem in solid-state physics
  • Learn about the properties of translation invariant potentials in quantum mechanics
  • Explore advanced techniques in solving integral equations in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the relationship between momentum eigenstates and wave functions in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on solid-state physics, wave function analysis, and the mathematical foundations of quantum theory.

king vitamin
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
486
Reaction score
245
Prove Bloch's Theorem from Integral Schrödinger's equation (sorry! tried to make an umlaut and accidentally hit the keyboard shortcut for posting, any way to edit titles?)

Homework Statement



If a scattering potential has the translation invariance property V(\mathbf{r} + \mathbf{R}) = V(\mathbf{r}), where \mathbf{R} is a constant vector, prove that the scattering solutions \psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)} of the integral form of the Schrödinger equation are Bloch wave functions, since they satisfy the relation

<br /> \psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}+\mathbf{R}) = e^{i \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{R}}\psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}).<br />

Homework Equations



The integral form of Schrödinger's equation is given as:

<br /> \psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}) = N e^{i \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}} - \frac{m}{2 \hbar^2 \pi} \int d^3 r&#039; \frac{\exp(\pm ik|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}&#039;|)}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}&#039;|}V(\mathbf{r}&#039;)\psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}&#039;)<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm don't seem to be getting anywhere here. I begin by computing:

<br /> \psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}+\mathbf{R}) = N e^{i \mathbf{k} \cdot (\mathbf{r}+\mathbf{R})} - \frac{m}{2 \hbar^2 \pi} \int d^3 r&#039; \frac{\exp(\pm ik|\mathbf{r}+\mathbf{R} - \mathbf{r}&#039;|)}{|\mathbf{r}+\mathbf{R} - \mathbf{r}&#039;|}V(\mathbf{r}&#039;)\psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}&#039;)<br />.

The first term is fine of course. In the second term, we obviously need to use the translation property of the potential, and we need to make the integral look like the original Schrödinger's equation for \psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}). So I change variables \mathbf{r}&#039; \rightarrow \mathbf{r}&#039; + \mathbf{R} (Jacobian is trivial for shifts):

<br /> \psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}+\mathbf{R}) = N e^{i \mathbf{k} \cdot (\mathbf{r}+\mathbf{R})} - \frac{m}{2 \hbar^2 \pi} \int d^3 r&#039; \frac{\exp(\pm ik|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}&#039;|)}{|\mathbf{r}- \mathbf{r}&#039;|}V(\mathbf{r}&#039;)\psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}&#039;+\mathbf{R})<br />

where I have used the translation property of the potential to shift it. This is where I'm stuck. I can't really work with the exact wave function, but the equation as it is seems to be impossible to work with because the arguments of the Green's function and the wave function don't match. If I could even get a hint as to the idea behind this it would really help.

I can also write:

<br /> \psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}+\mathbf{R}) = e^{i \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{R}} \left[N e^{i \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}} - \frac{m}{2 \hbar^2 \pi} \int d^3 r&#039; \frac{\exp(\pm ik|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}&#039;|)}{|\mathbf{r}- \mathbf{r}&#039;|}V(\mathbf{r}&#039;)e^{-i \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{R}}\psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}&#039;+\mathbf{R}) \right]<br />
where I want to show
<br /> e^{-i \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{R}}\psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}&#039;+\mathbf{R}) = \psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}&#039;)<br />.
This would work if the wavefunction were a momentum eigenstate (replace k by p/hbar), but I don't think this is true in general (k is defined as k^2 = 2mE/\hbar^2).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K