Prove/Disprove: $I+J$ and $I\cap J$ are Ideals of $A$

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Krizalid1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In the discussion, it is established that for ideals \(I\) and \(J\) of a ring \(A\), both \(I + J\) and \(I \cap J\) are indeed ideals of \(A\). The proof for \(I + J\) demonstrates that it is an additive subgroup and closed under multiplication by elements from \(A\). Similarly, \(I \cap J\) is shown to be an additive subgroup and retains closure under multiplication. This conclusion generalizes to any finite family of ideals indexed by a set, while the infinite case presents additional complexities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ring theory and the definition of ideals
  • Familiarity with additive subgroups and their properties
  • Knowledge of closure properties in algebraic structures
  • Basic proof techniques in abstract algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of ideals in commutative rings
  • Learn about the structure of finite and infinite families of ideals
  • Explore the concept of quotient rings and their relation to ideals
  • Investigate advanced topics such as Noetherian rings and their ideal properties
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and researchers in abstract algebra, particularly those focusing on ring theory, as well as mathematicians interested in the properties and applications of ideals in rings.

Krizalid1
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Let $I$ and $J$ be ideals of a ring $A.$ Are $I+J$ and $I\cap J$ ideals of $A$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
More general. Let $\{I_j:j\in J\}$ be a family of ideals of a ring $A$. Are $\displaystyle\sum_{j\in J}I_j$ and $\displaystyle\bigcap_{j\in J}I_j$ ideals of $A$?
 
This is merely matter of working through the definitions.

For example, let [math]r,r' \in I+J[/math]. This means that:

[math]r = x + y, r' = x' + y', x,x' \in I, y,y' \in J[/math].

So [math]r - r' = (x + y) - (x' + y') = (x - x') + (y - y') \in I+J[/math],

since [math]I,J[/math] are both ideals of [math]A[/math] (and thus additive subgroups).

This shows [math]I+J[/math] is an additive subgroup of [math](A,+)[/math].

Now let [math]a \in A[/math] be any element. We have:

[math]ar = a(x + y) = ax + ay \in I + J[/math], because [math]I,J[/math] are both IDEALS.

The proof that [math]ra \in I + J[/math] is similar, and left to the reader.

This proof clearly generalizes to any family of ideals indexed by a FINITE set. The infinite case has some complications better off discussed elsewhere.

A similar approach works for [math]I \cap J[/math]. It should be clear that [math]I \cap J[/math] is an additive subgroup of [math]A[/math]. I hope you can see how to prove that for any:

[math] a \in A, r \in I \cap J[/math] that [math] ar,ra \in I \cap J[/math].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K