MHB Prove/Disprove: $I+J$ and $I\cap J$ are Ideals of $A$

  • Thread starter Thread starter Krizalid1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
$I + J$ and $I \cap J$ are indeed ideals of a ring $A$ when $I$ and $J$ are ideals of $A$. The proof for $I + J$ shows it is an additive subgroup, and for any element $a \in A$, both $ar$ and $ra$ are in $I + J$, confirming it is an ideal. Similarly, $I \cap J$ is shown to be an additive subgroup, and for any $r \in I \cap J$, both $ar$ and $ra$ remain in $I \cap J$. This reasoning generalizes to any finite family of ideals, although the infinite case introduces complexities. The discussion emphasizes working through definitions to establish these properties.
Krizalid1
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Let $I$ and $J$ be ideals of a ring $A.$ Are $I+J$ and $I\cap J$ ideals of $A$?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
More general. Let $\{I_j:j\in J\}$ be a family of ideals of a ring $A$. Are $\displaystyle\sum_{j\in J}I_j$ and $\displaystyle\bigcap_{j\in J}I_j$ ideals of $A$?
 
This is merely matter of working through the definitions.

For example, let [math]r,r' \in I+J[/math]. This means that:

[math]r = x + y, r' = x' + y', x,x' \in I, y,y' \in J[/math].

So [math]r - r' = (x + y) - (x' + y') = (x - x') + (y - y') \in I+J[/math],

since [math]I,J[/math] are both ideals of [math]A[/math] (and thus additive subgroups).

This shows [math]I+J[/math] is an additive subgroup of [math](A,+)[/math].

Now let [math]a \in A[/math] be any element. We have:

[math]ar = a(x + y) = ax + ay \in I + J[/math], because [math]I,J[/math] are both IDEALS.

The proof that [math]ra \in I + J[/math] is similar, and left to the reader.

This proof clearly generalizes to any family of ideals indexed by a FINITE set. The infinite case has some complications better off discussed elsewhere.

A similar approach works for [math]I \cap J[/math]. It should be clear that [math]I \cap J[/math] is an additive subgroup of [math]A[/math]. I hope you can see how to prove that for any:

[math] a \in A, r \in I \cap J[/math] that [math] ar,ra \in I \cap J[/math].
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K