This is merely matter of working through the definitions.
For example, let [math]r,r' \in I+J[/math]. This means that:
[math]r = x + y, r' = x' + y', x,x' \in I, y,y' \in J[/math].
So [math]r - r' = (x + y) - (x' + y') = (x - x') + (y - y') \in I+J[/math],
since [math]I,J[/math] are both ideals of [math]A[/math] (and thus additive subgroups).
This shows [math]I+J[/math] is an additive subgroup of [math](A,+)[/math].
Now let [math]a \in A[/math] be any element. We have:
[math]ar = a(x + y) = ax + ay \in I + J[/math], because [math]I,J[/math] are both IDEALS.
The proof that [math]ra \in I + J[/math] is similar, and left to the reader.
This proof clearly generalizes to any family of ideals indexed by a FINITE set. The infinite case has some complications better off discussed elsewhere.
A similar approach works for [math]I \cap J[/math]. It should be clear that [math]I \cap J[/math] is an additive subgroup of [math]A[/math]. I hope you can see how to prove that for any:
[math] a \in A, r \in I \cap J[/math] that [math] ar,ra \in I \cap J[/math].