Prove f'(x) = a(n) x^(n-1): Math Steps & Examples

  • Thread starter Thread starter tonyviet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivatives E^x
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the derivative of a function, specifically the expression f'(x) = a(n)x^(n-1). The function in question appears to be f(x) = ax^2, but there is confusion regarding the notation and definitions used, particularly the relationship between f and F and the variable n.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express confusion about the formulation of the function and the notation used. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between different representations of the function and the implications of the variable n. Some participants question the validity of the original expressions and seek to understand the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants actively questioning the assumptions and definitions presented in the original post. There is no explicit consensus, but some guidance has been offered regarding the correct interpretation of the function and the derivative.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may be intended for a pre-calculus class, despite being framed in the context of introductory calculus. There is also mention of potential confusion regarding the definitions of terms and notation used in the problem.

tonyviet
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
1.

f(x)= ax^2 = ae^TR, nez
Prove f '(x) = a(n) x^(n-1)2.
n does not equal 03.
I don't even understand it
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


I don't understand it either- go back and check the problem again!

In particular, "F(x)= ax^2 = ae^TR" makes no sense- it appears to be saying that F(x) is equal to two different functions. The only way I could make sense of it is if they are the same function: x^2= e^(ln(x^2))= e^(2 ln(x)). How is "TR" defined?

In any case "f'(x)= a(n)x^(n-1)" makes no sense because there was no mention of either "f" or "n" before. Assuming you mean "F" and "f" to be the same function (a very bad practice- capital letters and small letters are different symbols and should represent different variables) there still was n "n" in the original formulation.

Of course, it is true that if f(x)= ax^n, not x^2, then f'(x)= a(n x^(n-1)). That is normally proved by using induction on n or the binomial theorem, long before the derivatives of e^x and ln(x) are introduced. But if you do have those, then you could argue that f(x)= ax^n= a e^(n ln(x)) so that f'(x)= a e^(n ln(x))*(n/x)= a(x^n)(n/x)= a(nx^(m-1)).
 


f(x)= ax^2 = aeTR (Not sure if its exponential), neZ
prove f '(x) = a(n)x^(n-1)
n does not equal 0
sorry about the mistake

This was for a pre-calculus class but the teacher stated that it was in introductory calculus, so i assume that it is before the derivatives of e^x.

Btw do you know what type of problem this is so I can look it up in the book?
 
Last edited:


I am confused on how you got:
F' (x) = ae ^( n ln(x)) * (n/x) = a(x^n)(n/x) then to a(nx ^(n-1))
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K