Prove: f(x) = e^{cx} for some constant c

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that a function f(x) satisfying f(x)f(y) = f(x+y) for all real x and y can be expressed as f(x) = e^{cx} for some constant c. In part (a), participants explore the implications of f being differentiable, leading to the conclusion that the limit lim_{h->0}[f(h)-1]/h exists, which supports the exponential form. For part (b), the challenge lies in demonstrating that continuity alone also ensures the existence of this limit. The conversation highlights the relationship between differentiability and analyticity, with some participants questioning the necessity of proving analyticity for the argument. Overall, the thread emphasizes the mathematical reasoning required to establish the exponential nature of f(x) under the given conditions.
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Suppose f(x)f(y)=f(x+y) for all real x and y,
(a) Assuming that f is differentiable and not zero, prove that

f(x) = e^{cx}

where c is a constant.

(b) Prove the same thing, assuming only that f is continuous.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


(a) The given information implies that f(x)^2 = f(2 x) and furthermore that f(x)^n = f(n x) for any natural number n. We can differentiate that to obtain f(x)^(n-1) f'(x) = f'(n x) for any natural number n.

It is also not hard to show that f'(x) f(y) = f'(y) f(x) for all real x and y.

We can take y = 0 to find that f(0) = 1 (I have used the fact that f is nonzero here).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For (a), would it not be easier to compare the power series of f(x) and ecx.
 
e(ho0n3 said:
For (a), would it not be easier to compare the power series of f(x) and ecx.

Perhaps, but I don't know how to prove that f is analytic.
 
You're told f is differentiable which is just another way of saying that it's analytic.
 
differentiability implies analyticity only in complex analysis. Rudin even gives an example of a function that is real-differentiable but not analytic in Exercise 8.1
 
show that a and b each imply
lim_{h->0}[f(h)-1]/h=c
and then
f(x)f(y)=f(x+y) for all real x and y
with
lim_{h->0}[f(h)-1]/h=c
imply
f(x)=exp(cx)
 
lurflurf said:
show that a and b each imply
lim_{h->0}[f(h)-1]/h=c
and then
f(x)f(y)=f(x+y) for all real x and y
with
lim_{h->0}[f(h)-1]/h=c
imply
f(x)=exp(cx)

I can prove part a). I can see how it would be enough to show that continuity implies lim_{h->0}[f(h)-f(0)]/h exists but I don't know how to do that.
 
You are given that f is differentiable.

f(x+h)- f(x)= f(x)f(h)- f(x)= f(x)[f(h)- 1].

f&#039;(x)= \lim_{\stack{h\rightarrow 0}}\frac{f(x+h)- f(x)}{h}= f(x) \lim_{\stack{h\rightarrow 0}}\frac{f(h)- 1}{h}[/itex]<br /> and <b>because</b> f is differentiable, that limit exists.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You are given that f is differentiable.

f(x+h)- f(x)= f(x)f(h)- f(x)= f(x)[f(h)- 1].

f&#039;(x)= \lim_{\stack{h\rightarrow 0}}\frac{f(x+h)- f(x)}{h}= f(x) \lim_{\stack{h\rightarrow 0}}\frac{f(h)- 1}{h}[/itex]<br /> and <b>because</b> f is differentiable, that limit exists.
<br /> <br /> I said I could do part a).<br /> <br /> But lurflurf said that (b) also implied that the limit exists.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
956
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K