MHB Prove $\frac{1}{3}\le \frac{u}{v} \le \frac{1}{2}$ with Triangle Sides

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the inequality $\frac{1}{3} \le \frac{u}{v} \le \frac{1}{2}$, where $u = a^2 + b^2 + c^2$ and $v = (a + b + c)^2$ for triangle sides $a$, $b$, and $c$. Participants emphasize the need to demonstrate that the upper limit of $\frac{1}{2}$ cannot be replaced by a smaller number. There is a correction noted regarding a typo in the previous messages. The conversation also highlights the importance of addressing all parts of the question for a complete solution. The thread ultimately seeks clarity on the proof and its implications for triangle side lengths.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $a,\,b$ and $b$ be the lengths of the sides of a triangle. Suppose that $u=a^2+b^2+c^2$ and $v=(a+b+c)^2$.

Prove that $\dfrac{1}{3}\le\dfrac{u}{v}\le\dfrac{1}{2}$ and that the fraction $\dfrac{1}{2}$ on the right cannot be replaced by a smaller number.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
we have $(a-b)^2 + (b-c)^2 + (c-a)^2 = a^2-2ab + b^2 + b^2-2bc + c^2 + c^2 -2ac + a^2$
$=(2(a^2+b^2+c^2 - ab + bc + ca) >=0$

or $a^2 + b^2 + c^2 >= ab + bc + ac \cdots(1)$

Now as a, b, c are sides of triangle we have

$a <= b + c$ or $a^2 <= ab + ac\cdots(2)$

similarly $b^2 <= ab + bc\cdots(3)$

and $c^2 <= bc + ac\cdots(4)$

adding (2) ,(3) , (4) we get $a^2 + b^2 + c^2 <= 2ab + 2bc + 2ca\cdots(2)$

Now we have $v = (a+b+c)^2 = (a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + 2(ab+bc+ca) <= (a^2+b^2+c^2) + 2(a^2+b^2+c^2$

or $ v <= 3(a^2+b^2+ c^2$

or $ v<=3u$

or $\frac{1}{3} < = \frac{u}{v}\cdots(5)$

Now for the 2nd part

$2u= u + u = (a^2+b^2+c^2) + (a^2 + b^2 + c^2 ) <= (a^2+b^2+c^2) + 2(ab+bc+ca)$ using (2)

or $2u <= (a+b+c)^2$ or $2u <= v\cdots(6)$

from (5) and (6) we get the result
 
Last edited:
Hi kaliprasad, thanks for participating! But I was wondering if you have somehow missed out the solution to the very last part of the question...
 
anemone said:
Hi kaliprasad, thanks for participating! But I was wondering if you have somehow missed out the solution to the very last part of the question...
There was a typo in 2nd last line it is corrected

I could not complete the part that fraction on the right cannot be replaced by a smaller number

other wise solution is complete
 
About the last part of the question...
If $a=b$ and $c=0$ then $u=2a^2$ and $v=4a^2$. So $\frac uv = \frac12.$ Of course, you cannot have a triangle with one side zero. But suppose you take an isosceles triangle with sides $a$, $a$ and $\varepsilon$. Then $$2u - v = 4a^2 + 2\varepsilon^2 - (2a + \varepsilon)^2 = \varepsilon(4a - \varepsilon),$$ which you can make as small as you like by taking $\varepsilon$ small enough. So $v$ can be made arbitrarily close to $2u$ and thus $\frac uv$ can be made arbitrarily close to $\frac12.$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top