MHB Prove function is a homomorphism

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathjam0990
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
mathjam0990
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Let G be a group. Fix g ∈ G. Define a map φ : G → G by φ(x) = gxg^−1

Prove: φ is an isomorphism

What I Know: I already showed it is bijective. Now, I need help proving the homomorphism part. I know by definition for all a,b in G, f(ab)=f(a)f(b)

Question: How do I show this? For some reason I am getting confused and I don't think it's that difficult but I can't grasp it.

What I Have Done:
Let a=gag^-1 and b=gbg^-1. Then f(ab)=f(gag^-1 * gbg^-1) Is this even correct or did I start off totally wrong?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mathjam0990,

The trick here is to use the fact that for all $x\in G$, $x^{-1}x = e$. Let $a,b\in G$. Then

$$\varphi(a)\varphi(b) = (gag^{-1})(gbg^{-1}) = ga(g^{-1}g)bg^{-1} = gaebg^{-1} = gabg^{-1} = \varphi(ab).$$

Therefore, $\varphi$ is a homomorphism.
 
Euge, thank you so much! I never would have guessed that. Much appreciated!
 
Thread 'How to define vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
942
Replies
1
Views
359
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
727
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
686
Replies
5
Views
932
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
677