MHB Prove G is a Subspace of V ⊕ V and Quotient Space (V ⊕ V)/G Isomorphic to V

toni07
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Prove that G is a subspace of V ⊕ V and the quotient space (V ⊕ V) / G is isomorphic to V.

Let $V$ be a vector space over $\Bbb{F}$, and let $T : V \rightarrow V$ be a linear operator on $V$. Let $G$ be the subset of $V \oplus V$ consisting of all ordered pairs $(x, T(x))$ for $x$ in $V$. I don't really understand what I am supposed to do. Is $G$ a subset of $V \oplus V$ or a subset of the ordered pairs $(x, T(x))$. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Prove that G is a subspace of V ⊕ V and the quotient space (V ⊕ V) / G is isomorphic to V.

crypt50 said:
Let $V$ be a vector space over $\Bbb{F}$, and let $T : V \rightarrow V$ be a linear operator on $V$. Let $G$ be the subset of $V \oplus V$ consisting of all ordered pairs $(x, T(x))$ for $x$ in $V$. I don't really understand what I am supposed to do. Is $G$ a subset of $V \oplus V$ or a subset of the ordered pairs $(x, T(x))$. Please help.
By definition, $V \oplus V$ consists of all ordered pairs $(x,y)$ for $x$ and $y$ in $V$.

$G$ consists of those elements $(x,y)$ in $V \oplus V$ for which $y = Tx$. So $G$ is a subset of $V \oplus V$, and your first task is to show that it is a subspace.
 
Re: Prove that G is a subspace of V ⊕ V and the quotient space (V ⊕ V) / G is isomorphic to V.

crypt50 said:
Let $V$ be a vector space over $\Bbb{F}$, and let $T : V \rightarrow V$ be a linear operator on $V$. Let $G$ be the subset of $V \oplus V$ consisting of all ordered pairs $(x, T(x))$ for $x$ in $V$. I don't really understand what I am supposed to do. Is $G$ a subset of $V \oplus V$ or a subset of the ordered pairs $(x, T(x))$. Please help.

Well you're told that elements of $G$ consist of all ordered pairs $(x,T(x))$ for $x\in V$; i.e.

\[G=\{(x,T(x)):x\in V\}\subset V\oplus V\]

To show that $G$ is a subspace of $v$, you want to take $u=(x_1,T(x_1))$ and $v=(x_2,T(x_2))$ and show that for any $a,b\in \Bbb{F}$, you have that $au+bv \in G$ (this is rather easy to show because addition is done component wise; furthermore you also know that $T$ is linear).

This is me going off on a limb (kind of; so I'd appreciate it if someone could point out if I'm wrong here), but I believe that in order to show that $(V\oplus V) / G\cong V$, you need to construct a morphism $\varphi : V\oplus V \rightarrow V$ where $\mathrm{Im}(\varphi)=V$ and $\ker\varphi = G$ (and thus you obtain the result by the First Isomorphism Theorem).
 
Thread 'How to define vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
727
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K