MHB Prove Inequality: $\frac{1}{2}$ Bound w/ x,y,z>0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the inequality $\frac{1}{(x+1)^2+y^2+1}+\frac{1}{(y+1)^2+z^2+1}+\frac{1}{(z+1)^2+x^2+1}\leq \frac{1}{2}$ under the conditions that x, y, z are positive and their product equals one. Participants highlight the symmetry of the expression, suggesting that the maximum occurs when x=y=z=1, yielding a sum of $\frac{1}{2}$. Some argue that while symmetry implies potential maxima, it does not conclusively prove that $\frac{1}{2}$ is indeed the maximum without further justification. The conversation emphasizes the need for a rigorous proof of the existence of maxima and the uniqueness of the solution. Ultimately, the discussion underscores the complexity of proving inequalities in symmetric expressions.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
x>0 ,y>0 ,z>0 and xyz=1 ,prove :

$ \dfrac{1}{(x+1)^2+y^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(y+1)^2+z^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(z+1)^2+x^2+1}\leq \dfrac{1}{2}$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Prove an inequality

Albert said:
x>0 ,y>0 ,z>0 and xyz=1 ,prove :

$ \dfrac{1}{(x+1)^2+y^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(y+1)^2+z^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(z+1)^2+x^2+1}\leq \dfrac{1}{2}$

It is quite evident the intrinsic symmetry of the expression, in the sense that x, y and z can be swapped and nothing change. Thqat suggests that it must be x=y=z=1 and in this case any memeber of the sum has value $\frac{1}{6}$ so that the sum is $\frac{1}{2}$ which is the maximum of the function with the condition x y z =1...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Re: Prove an inequality

Albert said:
x>0 ,y>0 ,z>0 and xyz=1 ,prove :

$ \dfrac{1}{(x+1)^2+y^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(y+1)^2+z^2+1}

+\dfrac{1}{(z+1)^2+x^2+1}\leq \dfrac{1}{2}$

for using $xyz=1$ and $AM\geq GM$

$\dfrac {z}{z}\times \dfrac{1}{(x+1)^2+y^2+1}\leq

\dfrac{z}{2(xz+z+1)}----(1)$

$\dfrac{xz}{xz}\times \dfrac{1}{(y+1)^2+z^2+1}\leq

\dfrac{xz}{2(xz+z+1)}----(2)$

$\dfrac{1}{(z+1)^2+x^2+1}\leq \dfrac{1}{2(xz+z+1)}----(3)$

(1)+(2)+(3) the proof is done
 
Last edited:
Re: Prove an inequality

chisigma said:
It is quite evident the intrinsic symmetry of the expression, in the sense that x, y and z can be swapped and nothing change. Thqat suggests that it must be x=y=z=1 and in this case any memeber of the sum has value $\frac{1}{6}$ so that the sum is $\frac{1}{2}$ which is the maximum of the function with the condition x y z =1...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
Hello Chisigma,

Your reasoning is not clear to me.
I guess you have implicitly assumed, and not proved, that a maxima exists.
Moreover, even if the existence of a maxima is settled, there may me multiple maximas.
I don't see how the symmetry is sufficient to conclude that $1/2$ is the maximum even if its given that a global maxima exists.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top